Advertisement
Canada markets close in 2 hours 35 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    22,263.08
    -83.68 (-0.37%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,302.38
    -4.63 (-0.09%)
     
  • DOW

    39,274.61
    -396.43 (-1.00%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7292
    -0.0014 (-0.19%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    76.70
    -0.87 (-1.12%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    93,198.68
    -3,220.17 (-3.34%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,470.54
    -32.12 (-2.14%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,343.70
    -49.20 (-2.06%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,063.44
    -18.27 (-0.88%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4890
    +0.0550 (+1.24%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    16,872.59
    +71.05 (+0.42%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    12.21
    -0.08 (-0.65%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,339.23
    -31.10 (-0.37%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,103.22
    +486.12 (+1.26%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6737
    -0.0008 (-0.12%)
     

Institutional investors are Couchbase, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BASE) biggest bettors and were rewarded after last week's US$95m market cap gain

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Couchbase's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • The top 10 shareholders own 52% of the company

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

Every investor in Couchbase, Inc. (NASDAQ:BASE) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 67% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$95m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 64% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Couchbase.

View our latest analysis for Couchbase

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Couchbase?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Couchbase does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Couchbase, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Couchbase. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 7.6% of shares outstanding. With 6.2% and 6.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, GPI Capital Limited and Accel Partners are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Matthew Cain is the owner of 1.8% of the company's shares.

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Couchbase

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Couchbase, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$33m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Couchbase. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 18% stake in Couchbase. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Couchbase .

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.