Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    21,554.86
    -26.44 (-0.12%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,464.62
    -8.55 (-0.16%)
     
  • DOW

    39,150.33
    +15.53 (+0.04%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7302
    -0.0004 (-0.05%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    80.59
    -0.70 (-0.86%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    87,733.96
    -270.87 (-0.31%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,320.82
    -39.51 (-2.90%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,334.70
    -34.30 (-1.45%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,022.03
    +4.64 (+0.23%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2570
    +0.0030 (+0.07%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,689.36
    -32.24 (-0.18%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    13.20
    -0.08 (-0.60%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,237.72
    -34.74 (-0.42%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,596.47
    -36.53 (-0.09%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6826
    +0.0005 (+0.07%)
     

With 42% stake, Red Violet, Inc. (NASDAQ:RDVT) seems to have captured institutional investors' interest

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Red Violet's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership

  • Insiders own 17% of Red Violet

If you want to know who really controls Red Violet, Inc. (NASDAQ:RDVT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 42% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Red Violet.

See our latest analysis for Red Violet

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Red Violet?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Red Violet does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Red Violet's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 24% of Red Violet. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Trigran Investments, Inc. with 16% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.9% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Derek Dubner, the CEO has 3.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Red Violet

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Red Violet, Inc.. Insiders have a US$48m stake in this US$288m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Red Violet. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Red Violet is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.