Canada markets closed

Sienna Senior Living Inc. (SIA.TO)

Toronto - Toronto Real Time Price. Currency in CAD
Add to watchlist
10.74+0.03 (+0.28%)
At close: 04:00PM EDT

Sienna Senior Living Inc.

302 Town Centre Boulevard
Suite 300
Markham, ON L3R 0E8
905 477 4006

IndustryMedical Care Facilities
Full Time Employees

Key Executives

NameTitlePayExercisedYear Born
Mr. Nitin JainCEO, Pres & Non-Independent Director1.25MN/A1977
Ms. Olga GiovannielloChief HR Officer & Exec. VP493.92kN/AN/A
Mr. Mark A. LugowskiExec. VP of Retirement Operations438.24kN/AN/A
Ms. Jennifer AndersonExec. VP of Long-Term Care Operations438.68kN/AN/A
Mr. David HungExec. VP & CFON/AN/AN/A
Mr. Adam WalshSr. VP, Corp. Sec. & Gen. CounselN/AN/A1974
Ms. Nancy WebbSr. VP of Public Affairs & MarketingN/AN/AN/A
Mr. Stephen RoySr. VP of Real Estate Devel. & ConstructionN/AN/AN/A
Dr. Hugh BoydChief Medical OfficerN/AN/AN/A
Ms. Teresa FritschChief Corp. Officer & Exec. VPN/AN/AN/A
Amounts are as of December 31, 2021 and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay is salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in CAD.


Sienna Senior Living Inc. provides senior living and long-term care (LTC) services in Canada. It operates through Retirement and LTC segments. The company offers a range of seniors' living options, including independent supportive and assisted living, memory care, and long-term care services. The company was formerly known as Leisureworld Senior Care Corporation and changed its name to Sienna Senior Living Inc. in May 2015. Sienna Senior Living Inc. was founded in 1972 and is headquartered in Markham, Canada.

Corporate Governance

Sienna Senior Living Inc.’s ISS Governance QualityScore as of March 30, 2023 is 7. The pillar scores are Audit: 9; Board: 5; Shareholder Rights: 7; Compensation: 7.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while a 10 indicates higher governance risk.