Canada markets closed

Alphabet Inc. (GOOG)

NasdaqGS - NasdaqGS Real Time Price. Currency in USD
Add to watchlist
186.61+2.12 (+1.15%)
At close: 04:00PM EDT
186.64 +0.03 (+0.02%)
After hours: 07:56PM EDT
Full screen
Trade prices are not sourced from all markets
Previous Close184.49
Open183.47
Bid186.58 x 200
Ask186.65 x 100
Day's Range183.07 - 186.95
52 Week Range115.83 - 187.50
Volume11,972,853
Avg. Volume19,355,129
Market Cap2.296T
Beta (5Y Monthly)1.01
PE Ratio (TTM)28.67
EPS (TTM)6.51
Earnings DateJul 23, 2024 - Jul 29, 2024
Forward Dividend & Yield0.80 (0.43%)
Ex-Dividend DateJun 10, 2024
1y Target Est185.79
  • Yahoo Finance Video

    Big Tech-EU regulation battle is 'new chapter in an old movie'

    Meta Platforms (META) is under fire by EU regulators who claim the company's ad subscription model is a pay-for-content scheme that requires users to choose between paying a fee or handing over more personal data to use for targeted advertising. Imperial College Business School professor of economics Tommaso Valletti joins Catalysts to discuss Big Tech's regulation issues in the EU. Valletti notes that the European Commission tried to use antitrust laws to curb the market power of some Big Tech companies. However, that approach moved slowly, so they decided to regulate companies under the Digital Markets Act (DMA), which is a new policy that is designed to target companies identified as "gatekeepers." Meta was identified by the Commission as a "gatekeeper" and could be faced with fines for violating the Digital Markets Act in its advertising model. Companies charged under the Digital Markets Act may respond, which would kick off a regulatory dialog. Valletti says, "I suspect that the stakes are so high because the philosophy of the European Commission is that they would like some Big Tech companies to change the business model. So in terms of Meta, it's about data collection. In terms of Apple (AAPL), they have an ecosystem which is completely closed and they want to have a revolution there. But these companies are making so much money that for them, it's better to fight on legal grounds instead of changing the business model." He explains that fines for violating the act are more like a "slap on the wrist" compared to the revenue generation of Big Tech names like Apple, Meta, and Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL): "Those fines don't really help at all if you want a certain conduct to be changed. And so you have to impose higher fines that DMA has the power to impose up to 10% of the global turnover. So actually this would be fines that hurt more. But then you have to go through courts to see whether this is going to happen or not. To me, it's more important, not that the fines are imposed, but the behavior of firms changes up-front because you don't want to fine people after they drive too fast. You want people to start slowing down." For more expert insight and the latest market action, click here to watch this full episode of Catalysts. This post was written by Melanie Riehl

  • Yahoo Finance

    AI meets 'Do no harm': Healthcare grapples with tech promises

    Companies have been touting the promises of artificial intelligence in healthcare, but a large proportion of doctors and patients still don't fully trust the technology.

  • Bloomberg

    Google’s Emissions Shot Up 48% Over Five Years Due to AI

    (Bloomberg) -- Google’s emissions climbed by almost half over five years, as the company has infused artificial intelligence throughout many of its core products — making it harder to meet its goal of eliminating carbon emissions by 2030, according to a new environmental report from the tech giant.Most Read from BloombergDemocrats Weigh Mid-July Vote to Formally Tap Biden as NomineePowerful Storm Beryl Aims at Jamaica After Grenada StrikeS&P 500 Closes Above 5,500 in Record-Breaking Run: Markets