Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    22,375.83
    +116.63 (+0.52%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,214.08
    +26.41 (+0.51%)
     
  • DOW

    39,387.76
    +331.37 (+0.85%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7314
    +0.0025 (+0.35%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    79.26
    +0.27 (+0.34%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    85,565.98
    +1,368.53 (+1.63%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,343.88
    +43.78 (+3.37%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,340.30
    +18.00 (+0.78%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,073.63
    +18.49 (+0.90%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4490
    -0.0430 (-0.96%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    18,214.50
    +28.00 (+0.15%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    12.69
    -0.31 (-2.38%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,381.35
    +27.30 (+0.33%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,073.98
    -128.42 (-0.34%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6779
    +0.0003 (+0.04%)
     

Trip.com Group Limited's (NASDAQ:TCOM) high institutional ownership speaks for itself as stock continues to impress, up 5.4% over last week

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Trip.com Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

A look at the shareholders of Trip.com Group Limited (NASDAQ:TCOM) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 63% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Last week’s 5.4% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 42%.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Trip.com Group.

See our latest analysis for Trip.com Group

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Trip.com Group?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Trip.com Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Trip.com Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Trip.com Group. The company's largest shareholder is Baidu, Inc., with ownership of 10%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 19 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Trip.com Group

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Trip.com Group Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$808m. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Trip.com Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Public Company Ownership

It appears to us that public companies own 15% of Trip.com Group. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.