Advertisement
Canada markets open in 6 hours 49 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,714.54
    -297.08 (-1.35%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,035.69
    -80.48 (-1.57%)
     
  • DOW

    37,815.92
    -570.17 (-1.49%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7260
    -0.0001 (-0.02%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    81.08
    -0.85 (-1.04%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    82,286.38
    -5,106.73 (-5.84%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,282.04
    -57.02 (-4.26%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,299.60
    -3.30 (-0.14%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,973.91
    -42.12 (-2.09%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6860
    +0.0720 (+1.56%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    17,479.50
    -91.75 (-0.52%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    15.65
    +0.98 (+6.68%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,144.13
    -2.90 (-0.04%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,274.05
    -131.61 (-0.34%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6807
    +0.0005 (+0.07%)
     

Sigma Healthcare Limited's (ASX:SIG) top owners are individual investors with 37% stake, while 36% is held by institutions

Key Insights

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Sigma Healthcare indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy

  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Institutions own 36% of Sigma Healthcare

A look at the shareholders of Sigma Healthcare Limited (ASX:SIG) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 37% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Institutions, on the other hand, account for 36% of the company's stockholders. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sigma Healthcare, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Sigma Healthcare

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sigma Healthcare?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Sigma Healthcare already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sigma Healthcare's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Sigma Healthcare is not owned by hedge funds. HMC Capital Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Sigma Healthcare

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

We can see that insiders own shares in Sigma Healthcare Limited. As individuals, the insiders collectively own AU$14m worth of the AU$761m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in Sigma Healthcare. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Public Company Ownership

We can see that public companies hold 20% of the Sigma Healthcare shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Sigma Healthcare has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.