Advertisement
Canada markets close in 6 hours 26 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    22,310.36
    +50.89 (+0.23%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,192.59
    +11.85 (+0.23%)
     
  • DOW

    38,921.16
    +68.89 (+0.18%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7312
    -0.0009 (-0.12%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    78.17
    -0.31 (-0.40%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    87,054.57
    +152.88 (+0.18%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,320.07
    -45.06 (-3.30%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,328.10
    -3.10 (-0.13%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,060.67
    +24.95 (+1.23%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4450
    -0.0440 (-0.98%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    16,372.02
    +22.78 (+0.14%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    13.43
    -0.06 (-0.44%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,327.50
    +114.01 (+1.39%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,835.10
    +599.03 (+1.57%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6779
    -0.0013 (-0.19%)
     

Retail investors are Lithium Chile Inc.'s (CVE:LITH) biggest owners and were rewarded after market cap rose by CA$60m last week

Key Insights

  • Significant control over Lithium Chile by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership

  • Insiders own 12% of Lithium Chile

Every investor in Lithium Chile Inc. (CVE:LITH) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

As a result, retail investors collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CA$227m market cap following a 36% gain in the stock.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Lithium Chile.

View our latest analysis for Lithium Chile

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lithium Chile?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Lithium Chile might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lithium Chile. Chengxin Lithium Group Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 18% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 18% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.7% by the third-largest shareholder. Albert Kroontje, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board. In addition, we found that Steven Cochrane, the CEO has 1.6% of the shares allocated to their name.

Our studies suggest that the top 11 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

Insider Ownership Of Lithium Chile

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Lithium Chile Inc.. Insiders have a CA$27m stake in this CA$227m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 51% of Lithium Chile. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 18%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Public Company Ownership

It appears to us that public companies own 18% of Lithium Chile. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Lithium Chile (at least 2 which are a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here