Q2 2023 Kelly Services Inc Earnings Call

Participants

Olivier G. Thirot; Executive VP & CFO; Kelly Services, Inc.

Peter W. Quigley; President, CEO & Director; Kelly Services, Inc.

Joseph Anthony Gomes; Senior Generalist Analyst; NOBLE Capital Markets, Inc., Research Division

Kartik Mehta; Executive MD, Director of Research, Principal & Equity Research Analyst; Northcoast Research Partners, LLC

Kevin Mark Steinke; MD; Barrington Research Associates, Inc., Research Division

Lalishwar Mitra Ramgopal; Healthcare Sell Side Analyst; Sidoti & Company, LLC

Presentation

Operator

Good morning, and welcome to Kelly Services' Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. (Operator Instructions) Today's call is being recorded at the request of Kelly Services. If anyone has any objections, you may disconnect at this time. A second quarter webcast presentation is also available on the Kelly website for this morning's call.
I would now like to turn the meeting over to your host, Mr. Peter Quigley, President and CEO. Please go ahead.

Peter W. Quigley

Thank you, Lois. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Kelly's second quarter conference call. Before we begin, I'll walk you through our safe harbor language, which can be found in our presentation materials. As a reminder, any comments made during this call, including the Q&A, may include forward-looking statements about our expectations for future performance. Actual results could differ materially from those suggested by our comments, and we have no obligation to update the statements made on this call.
Please refer to our SEC filings for a description of the risk factors that could influence the company's actual future performance. In addition, during the call, certain data will be discussed on a reported and on an adjusted basis. Discussion of items on an adjusted basis are non-GAAP financial measures designed to give insight into certain trends in our operations.
References to organic growth in our discussion today exclude the impact of the 2022 sale of our Russian operations. Finally, the slide deck we are using on today's call is available on our website.
We have a lot to cover today, so let's get started. In a moment, I'll invite Olivier Thirot, our Chief Financial Officer, to provide details on our financial results for the second quarter.
We'll spend the rest of our time providing an update on the transformation initiative I announced in May that is designed to significantly improve Kelly's EBITDA margin and accelerate profitable growth. Specifically, we'll review the aggressive actions we've taken, their immediate impact on our EBITDA margin, and our expectations for margin improvement going forward.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Olivier.

Olivier G. Thirot

Thank you, Peter, and good morning, everybody. For the second quarter of 2023, revenue totaled $1.2 billion, down 3.9% from the prior year, including 60 basis points of favorable currency impact. So revenues for the quarter were down 4.5% in constant currency. Included in that decrease is 230 basis points of unfavorable impact resulting from the 2022 sale of our operations in Russia. So our revenue overall was down 2.2% year-over-year on an organic constant currency basis.
As we look at the second quarter revenue by segment, our Education segment continues to report significant year-over-year growth, up 33% due to our net new customer wins, strong demand from existing customers and improved fill rate. PTS also continues to perform well as we anniversary the acquisition in the quarter. Overall, continued double-digit revenue growth demonstrates that our Education business is a significant growth engine even as broader economic trends soften.
In the SET segment, revenue was down by 7%. During the second quarter, we saw a continuation of the deceleration of demand for our specialty staffing as well as a slower revenue growth in some outcome-based specialties. Permanent placement fees were also impacted by a continued deceleration in market demand and declined 48%.
In our OCG segment, year-over-year revenue declined 9% on a reported basis and 8% in constant currency. The declines were primarily in RPO and PPO, while MSP revenues were nearly flat.
Revenue in our Professional & Industrial segment declined 9% year-over-year in the quarter. Revenue from our staffing product declined by 16%, reflecting the impact of economic headwinds, which are more noticeable in this segment. The segment outcome-based business delivered again solid revenue growth of 15% as the market continues to be strong for these value-added solutions. Placement fees declined 55% and were impacted by lower demand for full-time hiring.
Revenue in our International segment declined 9% on a nominal currency basis and was down 13% on a constant currency basis. Excluding the impact of the sale of our Russian operations, revenue declined 1% on an organic constant currency basis. Performance varied depending on geography and product.
For the quarter, we had good constant currency revenue growth in Mexico and Portugal, but that was more than offset by declines in the U.K., Switzerland, Italy and France. International's permanent placement fees were up 5% on an organic constant currency basis.
Overall gross profit was down 8.3% on a reported basis or 8.5% in constant currency. Our gross profit rate was 19.8% compared to 20.7% in the second quarter of last year. Our overall GP rate declined by 90 basis points. The primary driver was 70 basis points unfavorable impact from lower perm fees and 40 basis points of higher employee-related costs. These impacts were partially offset by 20 basis points of continued improvement in structural business mix.
SG&A expenses were down 3.4% year-over-year on a reported basis. Expenses for the second quarter of 2023 includes $5.6 million of charges related to our ongoing transformation efforts. So on an adjusted constant currency basis, expenses declined by 6.2% in the quarter. Contributing to that decline was lower performance-based incentive compensation related to our lower gross profit levels, and we have also started to see the early positive impact of our transformation efforts.
As we noted in our release in July, we have taken additional transformation-related actions in early Q3 and will recognize additional restructuring costs in Q3. Peter will provide more information on the transformation activities shortly today. In conjunction with our comprehensive review of SG&A as part of our transformation efforts, we also recognized a $2.4 million non-cash impairment charge related to an underutilized leased office space.
On a reported basis, our earnings from operations for the second quarter was $6.2 million compared to $8.2 million in Q2 of 2022. As noted, our 2023 Q2 results include the $8 million of charges related to our transformation activities. So adjusted earnings from operations in Q2 of 2023 were $14.2 million and adjusted EBITDA margin was 2%, similar to Q1.
And as a reminder, Kelly's Q2 2022 earnings from operation also include the impact of the 2022 non-cash charge related to the impairment of our Russian operations prior to their sale in July of 2022 as well as a $4.4 million gain on the sale of some assets. Income tax benefit for the second quarter was $1.9 million compared with our 2022 income tax expense of $4.9 million. Our effective tax rate for the quarter was 32.4%, benefit.
And finally, reported earnings per share for the second quarter of 2023 was $0.20 per share compared to $0.06 per share in 2022. Adjusted EPS for the second quarter of 2023 excluding the transformation-related charges, net of tax, was $0.36. And after adjusting for the 2022 asset impairment charges and the gain on sale of assets, net of tax, Q2 2022 EPS was $0.45. So on a like-for-like basis, EPS declined by 20%.
Now moving to the balance sheet, as of the end of the second quarter. As of the end of Q2, cash totaled $125 million compared to $154 million at the end of 2022. And we ended the second quarter of 2023 with no debt. Consistent with substantially no debt at the end of 2022 with our $300 million in available capacity on our credit facilities and our cash balances, we continue to have ample capital available to deploy.
As of the end of Q2, accounts receivable was $1.4 billion and decreased 5% year-over-year, reflecting a year-over-year decrease in DSO as well as a decrease in revenue. Global DSO was 61 days on par with year-end 2022 and today is lower than the second quarter of 2022. For the second quarter of 2023, we generated $32 million of free cash flow and year-to-date free cash flow now totals $14 million.
For the quarter, we have continued to maintain lower accounts receivable balances, primarily as a result of favorable DSO trends. A portion of those receivables are related to our MSP programs and are funded with supplier payables. So the lower net position has a limited impact on free cash flow generation. We have also continued to execute against the $50 million share repurchase program that we announced in November of last year, buying approximately 980,000 of shares for $16.5 million in the quarter, bringing the total repurchases to $42.6 million program to date.
And now back to you, Peter.

Peter W. Quigley

Thanks for those details, Olivier. In a moment, I'll invite Olivier to provide our outlook for the second half of 2023. It's important to note that our second half expectations reflect the impact of aggressive actions we've taken to date as part of our transformation. These actions amount to more than a cost-out exercise, and they differ fundamentally from the cost management actions we reported in the first quarter, which we implemented in response to near-term demand trends.
The recent steps we've taken represent a structural shift to the work we do within Kelly and how we do it, marking a necessary step forward on our journey to accelerate profitable growth. And they are already producing results. For more details on our expectations for the balance of the year, I'll turn it back to Olivier.

Olivier G. Thirot

Thank you, Peter. Our expectations for the rest of 2023, so the second half of the current year assume a continuation of current market conditions. For the second half of 2023, we expect nominal revenue to be flat to up 50 basis points year-over-year. We expect to maintain a GP rate above 20% because of the benefit of our structural business mix improvement, but continued softness in demand for full-time hiring will continue to compress permanent placement fees and ARPU.
All in, we expect our second half 2023 GP rate to be down by about 30 basis points to 20.1%. We expect second half adjusted SG&A to be down 5% to 6% lower than the same period of last year. This reflects the actions we have taken throughout the year to align expenses with top line trends, the impact of transformation-related workforce reduction actions taken in July and additional cost optimization actions we expect to complete this year.
Given the timing of these actions, we expect adjusted EBITDA margin in the second half of the year to be 2.3% to 2.5%, reflecting a 2023 exit rate of about 3%. For additional perspective, with the benefit of a full year of expected transformation-related savings and our current top line expectations, we would expect to reach a normalized adjusted EBITDA margin on a full year basis in the range of 3.3% to 3.5%.
And I now turn it back over to Peter for additional comments.

Peter W. Quigley

Thanks for those insights, Olivier. To put our expectations into context, consider that Kelly's average EBITDA margin has been approximately 2% for a very long time. An adjusted EBITDA margin improvement of 130 to 150 basis points at between 3.3% and 3.5% will mark a significant improvement in our ability to convert revenue and gross profit to earnings.
And as Olivier mentioned, our expectations assume no change to the current macroeconomic environment. They are driven entirely by the substantial progress we've made on multiple initiatives to drive sustained efficiency and accelerate profitable growth. In July, we announced strategic restructuring actions that further optimize the company's operating model to enhance organizational efficiency and effectiveness.
These actions followed a comprehensive review of our business and functional operations led by our transformation management office with support from a world-class transformation consultant. As part of the restructuring, we streamlined our organizational structure to reduce complexity and increase agility. We renegotiated supplier agreements and real estate contracts to secure terms that match our needs going forward.
We revamped our performance management process to drive behaviors that will sustain these structural improvements, and we made the difficult decision to implement a workforce reduction plan to align our resources with our new ways of working. These actions, among others, are on track to deliver a 3% EBITDA margin exit rate in 2023.
We're committed to sustaining these efficiencies, having established rigorous controls that provide clear visibility into resources and expenses across the enterprise. These measures are designed to ensure the longevity of the structural changes we've made and serve as the foundation for further EBITDA margin expansion going forward.
With our efficiency actions, creating the necessary financial headroom to invest in our future, we're quickly switching gears to the next phase of our transformation, driving growth. To that end, we've undertaken several initiatives that will accelerate profitable growth over the long term.
The scope of these initiatives encompasses our go-to-market strategy, the technology and systems that underpin our operations as well as organic and inorganic growth opportunities. Some examples include developing a comprehensive go-to-market strategy with innovative offerings to capture a greater share of wallet with large enterprise accounts, committing to our inorganic investments and identifying additional high-margin, high-growth targets, aligning incentive programs to these initiatives and their expected outcomes and sharpening our focus on DSO to drive free cash flow. The growth initiatives we're undertaking will be additive to the structural changes we've made to drive efficiency, which are the basis for our expectations for EBITDA margin improvement.
Together, they will unlock the potential of our specialty strategy and accelerate both top and bottom line growth. I will share more details with you about our growth initiatives on our third quarter earnings conference call in November.
Reflecting on the past several months of work, I can say with confidence that this transformation is fundamentally different than any other effort during the more than 20 years I've been with the company. Different in terms of the depth of our analysis, the speed and precision with which we're executing and most importantly, impact.
The change we set out to create within Kelly is no longer hypothetical. This transformation is delivering results. And while I'm pleased with the progress we've achieved thus far, our success will be determined by our ability to deliver on the important work that lies ahead.
I have every confidence that the collective strength and resilience of Team Kelly will continue to propel us forward on our journey as it has over the last few months, indeed, the past 76 years. As we navigate this period of change together, our commitment to our talent and customers remain steadfast.
I'm grateful to them and to our Board of Directors and shareholders for recognizing the value-creating potential of this company.
Lois, you can now open the call to questions.

Question and Answer Session

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our first question is from Kartik Mehta from Northcoast Research.

Kartik Mehta

Peter, just trying on the transformation side, I'd be interested just timing of normalized EBITDA margins when you'd expect to achieve that? I know you said the exit rate coming out at the end of this year will be 3. So are you assuming that you can achieve your normalized EBITDA margins by sometime in 2024?

Olivier G. Thirot

Yes. I mean, it's clearly 2024. And again, to make it clear, the improvement we have laid out, especially on a full year basis, 3.3 to 3.5 is assuming the current top line trends based on the current economic environment, the GP rate we are in now and the full year impact of this transformation. So -- and it does not include anything about the Phase 2 of this transformation, which is about growth, right? It's really the pure impact of the efficiency initiatives that Peter was talking about, and that should be basically our starting point for 2024.

Kartik Mehta

And then obviously, you've talked about businesses that you'd like to accelerate growth. But are there any businesses that you might deemphasize as a result of all these initiatives.

Peter W. Quigley

We're continuously reviewing our portfolio to ensure that we have opportunity to create value. There is no specific business line that we've identified as a result of the transformation activities, but we have identified ways to improve the operational efficiency in each of our businesses, and we expect to see the benefits of that starting immediately.

Kartik Mehta

And just 1 last question, Olivier. Trends in July, maybe what you saw kind of how they defer more different than June if they were?

Olivier G. Thirot

Well, I would say, when I look at the Q2 exit rate in terms of revenue and what we start to see in the beginning of Q3, I would say, no real big change, no improvement, I would say, which is not a surprise because I think the market conditions are pretty similar to what they were in Q2.
So I would say we have started Q3 with a pretty similar situation than in Q2. The only thing that I would like to mention is all about Education seasonality. You know that basically Q3 -- basically Q3 is a low quarter because of the school year. And that, of course, is something you need to consider when you look at Q3, because of this seasonality with, of course, a high and peak season again in Q4.

Kartik Mehta

And just -- I apologize. From an FX standpoint, would you expect FX to be neutral in the second half of this year?

Olivier G. Thirot

Well, when I was talking about nominal revenue H2 flat to up 0.5%, expectation now based on -- what we have seen so far is a positive FX impact between, let's say, 100, 120 basis points.

Operator

And the next question is from Joe Gomes from Noble Capital.

Joseph Anthony Gomes

So I'm just trying to wrap my head around the whole program. I was looking in your -- pardon me, in the presentation from this morning and on Page 16, you've got the big chart there, the operating model aligns to the specialties, redesign operating model to drive profitable growth in our chosen specialties.
And then I went back and I'm looking at some of your older presentations, and basically, it's the same chart or the same graph, each one of the different segments and the revenues and it says everything exactly the same. So I'm really trying to figure out what is really going to be different here? I mean -- and kind of relatedly, you talk about doing more tech investment, you've done a lot of tech investment over the past 2 years or so, what more tech investment needs to get done in order to really drive what you're looking to accomplish?

Peter W. Quigley

Well, Joe, I'd say the -- while the structure hasn't changed in terms of the number of our business units, the way in which we're both going to market, but also the changes we made as part of the transformation that we announced in -- I announced in May and then we effected in July.
We're structurally taking complexity out of the way we work. We're reducing spans and layers that slow decision-making. We have stopped non-core, nice-to-have initiatives, and we've moved targeted resources and decision-making closer to the business. So we not only achieved substantial expense savings, but we also have improved the -- or optimize the operating model.
The technology is going to be an ongoing -- we have to continue to make investments in technology, whether it's AI-driven digital tools, or other advances that in order to not only stay competitive but to create market differentiation or Helix solution in our OCG practice has been game changing in terms of customer reception, and we will continue to invest in state-of-the-art solutions like that, that require investment in technology.

Joseph Anthony Gomes

Okay. Kind of, on the tech side, again, last quarter, we talked a little bit about your new digital workers program. And you said at that point, you're getting some positive feedback. I was wondering maybe give a little quick update on how that program is unfolding?

Peter W. Quigley

I would say it's still early, but the number of customers that have expressed interest in understanding how it would work in their operations continues to increase. And it's generating a lot of, I would say, ancillary benefit because we can help customers review how they're getting work done and that provides opportunities, if it's not the digital worker, then it's potentially our outcome-based business that could benefit from the conversation with customers around the future of their work.

Joseph Anthony Gomes

Okay. And then 1 last 1 for me, if I may. Nice job in the quarter again on the buyback. I think, Olivier, you said you're about $42 million now versus $50 million program. How does the buyback -- and I understand the Board has to prove that stuff. But how does that kind of fit into the new model. Is that something that you would think should continue? Or would you be looking at, hey, maybe those dollars are better invested in unfolding our new model?

Peter W. Quigley

Yes. Joe, I'll let Olivier update the -- where we are, but the share repurchase is part of our capital deployment conversations with -- that we have with the Board regularly. It's -- we're going to finish the share repurchase program we announced last November to the extent we're able to. And we'll include it as part of future conversations with the Board.

Olivier G. Thirot

Yes. I mean, when you think about where we are $43 million, almost $43 million program to date. I think, when you look at that, we are on track, I think, to complete this program as we anniversary this program in November. If you combine it with what we have done in Q1 of last year with the Persol Cross shareholding, we have bought about 4.3 million of shares for a total amount of $70 million.
So it has a meaningful impact on our EPS, because of the reduction of the number of shares. But as Peter was saying, we are going to need to reflect a little bit on what are the next steps and this is something that -- as Peter mentioned, we are discussing with the Board on a regular basis. But again, $50 million out of our overall capital allocation we always said, and I think that the reality is that it does not impact our focus on growth, whether it's organic or inorganic because it is -- $50 million is meaningful, but not something where we can say, we do it and it is detrimental to our core focus, which is putting our capital towards growth.

Operator

Our next question is from Kevin Steinke from Barrington Research.

Kevin Mark Steinke

Just wanted to get a sense for the revenue expectations for 2024 as much as you can speak to it. You talked about the 3.3% to 3.5% EBITDA margin goal for 2024 assuming current economic conditions. Just directionally, should we think about a slight or modest organic constant currency revenue declines in 2024? Similar to the what you're expecting for the second half of 2023 or flattish, just directionally, what are you incorporating into that 2024 margin outlook?

Olivier G. Thirot

Yes. To make it clear, the 3.3% to 3.5% is not a 2024 outlook, right? It is more to say with current trends, with no change, whether it's revenue or margin or gross margin, if you think about the full impact of our current transformation, we would go for 3.3% to 3.5%. But again, it is not an outlook for 2024. It is more assuming, well, if this environment continues and basically, the current trend we have, the current revenue we have as well as gross margin rate are similar in the future. The full year impact of this transformation would lead us to move from 2% EBITDA margin to 3.3% to 3.5%.
Now thinking about 2024, it's probably too early to call on what is going to happen where we are actively working is not just waiting for a better economic environment. As Peter was saying, we have on top of efficiency, a lot of growth initiatives that should help us to gain market share without assuming any specific change in the current economic and market environment.

Kevin Mark Steinke

Okay. I just -- I mean, presumably, you'd have to take some sort of revenue expectation into that margin outlook. That was the only thing I was getting at, but I understand you weren't providing a specific.

Olivier G. Thirot

To make it very clear, I mean, the 3.3% to 3.5%, Kevin, basically, what we did was to take our expectation for the second half of the year of 2023, get it annualized in the GP margin I was talking about and then basically adjusting our SG&A based on the full year impact of the transformation. So if you do that, basically, you're going to get the 3.3% to 3.5%.

Kevin Mark Steinke

Okay. Perfect. That's very helpful. And just talking more about the transformation here, laying a foundation for future EBITDA margin expansion. Is it assumed then that when revenue does start growing again that expenses in the future will grow more slowly than they have in the past, thus being able to accelerate your trajectory of margin expansion? I mean, specifically in your slide on Page 14, you talk about establishing controls to provide clear visibility in the resource and expenses.
So I'm just wondering if something has changed with this transformation where you are going to maybe control or monitor expenses more closely as revenue is growing and get more leverage out of that growth in the future.

Peter W. Quigley

Yes, definitely. That's a primary outcome from the transformation initiatives and the work we've done with our outside consultant to create a governance process to manage and control expenses going forward. It is a fundamental part of the transformation to ensure that our growth in the future is advantaged by the significant and aggressive actions we've made on the expense line, and ensuring that those expenses don't come back. Of course, we're in a business where when we're growing quickly, we need to add resources. We are adding resources, for example, in education, because it's growing right now. But we are going to be managing certainly any other kind of non-revenue GP producing expenses very tightly and making sure that even with the other resources that we bring back, we're doing so in a very disciplined with strong governance.

Olivier G. Thirot

I would just add back to a sustainable transformation. One of the criteria the KPI we are going to continue to use and expect to improve significantly is what is called incremental conversion rate. How much of GP growth we can convert to revenue? Historically, our conversion rate was about 15%. Part of the transformation is to make sure that our incremental conversion rate in the future is significantly better than the 15% we have seen in the past.

Kevin Mark Steinke

Okay. Great. That's very helpful. Just when thinking about the current environment here in terms of the slowdown you've been seeing, is it more weighted towards existing customers cutting back? Or have you also seen the new business pipeline slow down? I don't know if you can provide kind of that mix that you're seeing in terms of the demand trends?

Peter W. Quigley

Yes, Kevin, I would say in both cases, it's not necessarily a significant impact on demand or the pipeline as much as it is cautiousness in the decision-making, the volume that people are planning for and the -- just the overall cautiousness that leads to customers and the pipeline taking longer to develop. And that's what we're seeing.
Of course, you have fluctuations depending on industry, among our customers and the pipeline. But I would just say, overall, there is some headwinds that people are feeling that is reflected in their demand and hiring decisions.

Kevin Mark Steinke

Okay. Just lastly, I'll jump back in the queue. Is there kind of a cadence to the quarterly progression that we should think about in the second half in terms of just the growth in margin? Or is -- would you expect them to be relatively similar in terms of the growth rates and margins?

Olivier G. Thirot

Well, I think that the first gate, at least financially speaking, is going to be this exit rate of EBITDA margin at 3% leaving 2023. But as Peter was saying, we are going to continue to inform you on the progress we are making beyond the outcome, which should be significantly and quick improvement of EBITDA margin. And as Peter mentioned, in November, we are going to spend much more time on the growth, part of this transformation.

Kevin Mark Steinke

Okay. And so when you say exit rate for 3%, does that imply like a 3% for the full fourth quarter?

Olivier G. Thirot

Yes, it's Q4. I would not use December to do it, because December is a specific month. So exit rate is going to be ready for the entire Q4.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our next question is from Mitra Ramgopal from Sidoti.

Lalishwar Mitra Ramgopal

Olivier, first, a couple of questions for you. I think in 2Q, the restructuring charge was about $8 million. Just how should we think about it for the second half of the year, 3Q, Q4? And do you expect even additional charges heading into '24?

Olivier G. Thirot

You mean restructuring charges, transformation changes.

Lalishwar Mitra Ramgopal

Yes.

Olivier G. Thirot

Yes. I mean if you think about -- you know already because that's something we have disclosed in July that we have this event at the end of July that will create $7.5 million to $8.5 million of cost. But of course, as I said in my comments, we have further initiatives underway that would trigger additional restructuring costs or transformation costs in the course of Q3 and Q4 and potentially in the first half of next year. Yes.

Lalishwar Mitra Ramgopal

Okay. And just in terms of the tax rate, I know you had a tax benefit this quarter, but how should we think about that for the remainder of the year?

Olivier G. Thirot

Yes. It's -- our tax rate, I mean, effective tax rate is really, I would say, explainable, but sometimes a little bit difficult to forecast. I would say on a normalized basis, we are still on mid-teens to high teens. And of course, we have a lot of events that are impacting our effective tax rate.
If I take the example of Q2, why basically, we've got benefit in sale of the charge and effective tax rate of 32.5% is basically because of our MSP program where we have basically technically some investment through some insurance programs that are basically tax deductible and when market conditions are good, and the MSP program is providing some upside. Basically, we've got a benefit on our income tax. And that's the main reason why in Q2, our tax rate basically was basically a credit. But I would say on a more normalized basis, I'm still suggesting something between 15% to 19% effective tax rate.

Lalishwar Mitra Ramgopal

Okay. That's great. And Peter, you mentioned inorganic opportunities, something you would continue to look at. But is that more of a medium, longer-term vision in light of the extensive transformation that you're doing in the near term?

Peter W. Quigley

Well, we'll continue to develop a pipeline of opportunities. The market right now is -- and is -- the term a little cautious. There's not as many high-quality assets companies on the market right now or that are willing to come off the sidelines based on proactive inquiries. But we think that in the areas that we've identified inside our Science, Engineering and Technology business unit inside Education, inside OCG, we will continue to look for high-quality, high-margin, high-growth assets that we can add to the portfolio to complement the organic growth initiatives that we're undertaking.

Operator

And we do have a follow-up question from Kevin Steinke.

Kevin Mark Steinke

Just 1 follow-up. Continuing on with the question about inorganic opportunities. And you mentioned that as you're working on strategic initiatives related to inorganic opportunities. I mean, as part of the transformation, do you expect to be even more aggressive in seeking acquisitions? Or is it more about the types of businesses you're targeting as you think about what might have changed with this transformation initiative?

Peter W. Quigley

Well, as Olivier commented, Kevin, we have ample capacity. And I don't think I would describe it as more aggressive. We're already comparatively, we're already acting more aggressively than we have in the past few years. We've acquired a number of companies, and we're pleased with the progress. We're continuing to look for properties that will contribute, again, high margin, high growth to the Kelly portfolio. I don't -- but I don't -- we're acting with urgency and a great deal of excitement, but we're not going to overspend, and we're not going to settle for properties that don't satisfy the attributes that I mentioned.

Operator

And at this time, there are no further questions in queue. Please continue.

Peter W. Quigley

Lois, if there are no further questions, I think we can end the call.

Operator

Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude your conference for today. Thank you for your participation and for using AT&T teleconference. You may now disconnect.