Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    24,471.17
    +168.87 (+0.69%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,859.85
    +44.82 (+0.77%)
     
  • DOW

    43,065.22
    +201.36 (+0.47%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7250
    -0.0020 (-0.28%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    71.86
    -3.70 (-4.90%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    90,827.57
    +4,140.35 (+4.78%)
     
  • XRP CAD

    0.75
    +0.02 (+2.95%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,665.80
    -10.50 (-0.39%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,248.64
    +14.23 (+0.64%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.0980
    +0.0250 (+0.61%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    18,502.69
    +159.75 (+0.87%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    19.70
    -0.76 (-3.71%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,292.66
    +39.01 (+0.47%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,605.80
    +224.90 (+0.57%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6642
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     

Pacific Current Group Limited (ASX:PAC) has caught the attention of institutional investors who hold a sizeable 41% stake

A look at the shareholders of Pacific Current Group Limited (ASX:PAC) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 41% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Pacific Current Group.

View our latest analysis for Pacific Current Group

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pacific Current Group?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pacific Current Group. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pacific Current Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 12% of Pacific Current Group. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Perpetual Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. River Capital Pty Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and Regal Partners Limited holds about 12% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Paul Greenwood directly holds 1.3% of the total shares outstanding.

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

Insider Ownership Of Pacific Current Group

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Pacific Current Group Limited. Insiders have a AU$57m stake in this AU$416m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Pacific Current Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 5.0%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Pacific Current Group (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here