Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    21,875.79
    -66.37 (-0.30%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,460.48
    -22.39 (-0.41%)
     
  • DOW

    39,118.86
    -45.20 (-0.12%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7312
    +0.0011 (+0.15%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    81.46
    -0.28 (-0.34%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    83,152.67
    -1,120.03 (-1.33%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,264.21
    -19.61 (-1.53%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,336.90
    +0.30 (+0.01%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,047.69
    +9.35 (+0.46%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3430
    +0.0550 (+1.28%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,732.60
    -126.08 (-0.71%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    12.44
    +0.20 (+1.63%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,164.12
    -15.56 (-0.19%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,583.08
    +241.54 (+0.61%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6820
    +0.0003 (+0.04%)
     

Opinion: Canada’s economy has stagnated despite Trudeau government spin

gdp-productivity-gs0417
gdp-productivity-gs0417

Growth in gross domestic product (GDP), the total value of all goods and services produced in the economy annually, is one of the most frequently cited indicators of economic performance. To assess Canadian living standards and the current health of the economy, journalists, politicians and analysts often compare Canada’s GDP growth to growth in other countries or in Canada’s past. But GDP is misleading as a measure of living standards when population growth rates vary greatly across countries or over time.

Federal Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland recently boasted that Canada had experienced the “strongest economic growth in the G7” in 2022. In this she echoes then-prime minister Stephen Harper, who said in 2015 that Canada’s GDP growth was “head and shoulders above all our G7 partners over the long term.”

Unfortunately, such statements do more to obscure public understanding of Canada’s economic performance than enlighten it. Lately, our aggregate GDP growth has been driven primarily by population and labour force growth, not productivity improvements. It is not mainly the result of Canadians becoming better at producing goods and services and thus generating more real income for their families. Instead, it is a result of there simply being more people working. That increases the total amount of goods and services produced but doesn’t translate into increased living standards.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s look at the numbers. From 2000 to 2023 Canada’s annual average growth in real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) GDP growth was the second highest in the G7 at 1.8 per cent, just behind the United States at 1.9 per cent. That sounds good — until you adjust for population. Then a completely different story emerges.

Over the same period, the growth rate of Canada’s real per person GDP (0.7 per cent) was meaningfully worse than the G7 average (1.0 per cent). The gap with the U.S. (1.2 per cent) was even larger. Only Italy performed worse than Canada.

Why the inversion of results from good to bad? Because Canada has had by far the fastest population growth rate in the G7, an average of 1.1 per cent per year — more than twice the 0.5 per cent experienced in the G7 as a whole. In aggregate, Canada’s population increased by 29.8 per cent during this period, compared to just 11.5 per cent in the entire G7.

Starting in 2016, sharply higher rates of immigration have led to a pronounced increase in Canada’s population growth. This increase has obscured historically weak economic growth per person over the same period. From 2015 to 2023, under the Trudeau government, real per person economic growth averaged just 0.3 per cent. That compares with 0.8 per cent annually under Brian Mulroney, 2.4 per cent under Jean Chrétien and 2.0 per cent under Paul Martin.

Canada is neither leading the G7 nor doing well in historical terms when it comes to economic growth measures that make simple adjustments for our rapidly growing population. In reality, we’ve become a growth laggard and our living standards have largely stagnated for the better part of a decade.

Ben Eisen, Milagros Palacios and Lawrence Schembri are analysts at the Fraser Institute.

Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the business news you need to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.