Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    21,875.79
    -66.37 (-0.30%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,460.48
    -22.39 (-0.41%)
     
  • DOW

    39,118.86
    -45.20 (-0.12%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7312
    +0.0011 (+0.15%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    81.46
    -0.28 (-0.34%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    82,588.23
    -1,709.45 (-2.03%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,257.15
    -26.68 (-2.08%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,336.90
    +0.30 (+0.01%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,047.69
    +9.35 (+0.46%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3430
    +0.0550 (+1.28%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,732.60
    -126.08 (-0.71%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    12.44
    +0.20 (+1.63%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,164.12
    -15.56 (-0.19%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,583.08
    +241.54 (+0.61%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6820
    +0.0003 (+0.04%)
     

One Ooma Insider Raised Their Stake In The Previous Year

Looking at Ooma, Inc.'s (NYSE:OOMA ) insider transactions over the last year, we can see that insiders were net buyers. That is, there were more number of shares purchased by insiders than there were sold.

While we would never suggest that investors should base their decisions solely on what the directors of a company have been doing, we do think it is perfectly logical to keep tabs on what insiders are doing.

See our latest analysis for Ooma

Ooma Insider Transactions Over The Last Year

The President Eric Stang made the biggest insider purchase in the last 12 months. That single transaction was for US$98k worth of shares at a price of US$9.85 each. That means that an insider was happy to buy shares at above the current price of US$8.55. Their view may have changed since then, but at least it shows they felt optimistic at the time. We always take careful note of the price insiders pay when purchasing shares. As a general rule, we feel more positive about a stock when an insider has bought shares at above current prices, because that suggests they viewed the stock as good value, even at a higher price. Eric Stang was the only individual insider to buy shares in the last twelve months.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eric Stang bought 15.00k shares over the last 12 months at an average price of US$9.93. You can see a visual depiction of insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last 12 months, below. If you click on the chart, you can see all the individual transactions, including the share price, individual, and the date!

insider-trading-volume
insider-trading-volume

There are plenty of other companies that have insiders buying up shares. You probably do not want to miss this free list of undervalued small cap companies that insiders are buying.

Does Ooma Boast High Insider Ownership?

Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. A high insider ownership often makes company leadership more mindful of shareholder interests. Insiders own 7.9% of Ooma shares, worth about US$18m. While this is a strong but not outstanding level of insider ownership, it's enough to indicate some alignment between management and smaller shareholders.

So What Do The Ooma Insider Transactions Indicate?

The fact that there have been no Ooma insider transactions recently certainly doesn't bother us. On a brighter note, the transactions over the last year are encouraging. Overall we don't see anything to make us think Ooma insiders are doubting the company, and they do own shares. So these insider transactions can help us build a thesis about the stock, but it's also worthwhile knowing the risks facing this company. While conducting our analysis, we found that Ooma has 1 warning sign and it would be unwise to ignore it.

Of course Ooma may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of high quality companies.

For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com