Advertisement
Canada markets open in 5 hours 6 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,885.38
    +11.66 (+0.05%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,048.42
    -23.21 (-0.46%)
     
  • DOW

    38,085.80
    -375.12 (-0.98%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7329
    +0.0006 (+0.08%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.84
    +0.27 (+0.32%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    87,878.55
    +345.88 (+0.40%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,388.57
    -7.96 (-0.57%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,359.20
    +16.70 (+0.71%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,981.12
    -14.31 (-0.72%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.7060
    +0.0540 (+1.16%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    17,755.00
    +187.50 (+1.07%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    15.51
    +0.14 (+0.91%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,118.38
    +39.52 (+0.49%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6822
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     

Muscle Cars Disappoint in Crash Tests

Muscle Cars Disappoint in Crash Tests

In their first-ever tests for crashworthiness by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2016 models of the Ford Mustang, Dodge Challenger, and Chevrolet Camaro failed to score the coveted Top Safety Pick rating by the agency.

Although they make up a relatively small share of the overall car market, these three muscle cars, especially in their powerful V8 configurations, are popular with consumers, including vacationers who rent them and young drivers with more courage than skill.

The IIHS battery of tests includes evaluations of a car’s performance in moderate and small-overlap frontal crash tests into a barrier at 40 mph—the latter similar to colliding with a car crossing the center line. There also is a side-impact test, and evaluations of a car’s roof strength and head restraint geometry.

Challenger, Camaro Trail Mustang

The Mustang came closest to earning a Top Safety Pick rating, getting “good” marks in all tests, but needing to improve its small-overlap performance.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Challenger needed the most improvement, scoring a “marginal” in the small overlap test and “acceptable” for roof strength and head-restraint performance.

The Camaro scored a “good” in the three major crash tests but was only “acceptable” for roof strength.

As for frontal crash-prevention technology, the Mustang and the Challenger scored only a “basic,” while the Camaro lacks an available front crash prevention system.

Check out our IIHS crash test video hub.



More from Consumer Reports:
5 least reliable cars from Consumer Reports' survey
Best Used Cars for $25,000 and Less
Which Car Brands make the Best Vehicles

Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers on this website. Copyright © 2006-2016 Consumers Union of U.S.