Advertisement
Canada markets close in 1 hour 2 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,982.06
    +96.68 (+0.44%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,106.40
    +57.98 (+1.15%)
     
  • DOW

    38,293.58
    +207.78 (+0.55%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7323
    -0.0001 (-0.01%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.77
    +0.20 (+0.24%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    87,424.49
    -866.68 (-0.98%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,334.20
    -62.33 (-4.46%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,351.50
    +9.00 (+0.38%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,003.50
    +22.39 (+1.13%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6710
    -0.0350 (-0.74%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,931.77
    +320.01 (+2.05%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    15.07
    -0.30 (-1.95%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,139.83
    +60.97 (+0.75%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6838
    +0.0017 (+0.25%)
     

Monitoring voter turnout across token governance: Part 1

Disclaimer: These summaries are provided for educational purposes only by Nelson Rosario and Stephen Palley. They are not legal advice.The post Lawsuit alleges underuse of fake interest-creating bots appeared first on The Block.

US Corporate Governance participation, a benchmark for token participation overtime?

In evaluating governance participation it’s helpful to have a benchmark to make relative comparisons against. While some ‘comparables’ to other voter participation may include general political election turnouts: US Presidential Elections saw ~57% turnout between 2000-2016/ Political referendums (Brexit ~72%), or the medium of voting for political elections digitally (like in Estonia which saw ~44% of participating parliament election voters use i-voting, up 13% since 2015), we think the best yardstick for token based governance — and learning what drives greaater participation — is comparing results to corporate governance.

Join Genesis now and continue reading, Monitoring voter turnout across token governance: Part 1!