Advertisement
Canada markets close in 1 hour 54 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,980.40
    +95.02 (+0.43%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,108.78
    +60.36 (+1.20%)
     
  • DOW

    38,318.02
    +232.22 (+0.61%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7319
    -0.0005 (-0.06%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.82
    +0.25 (+0.30%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    87,483.68
    -839.89 (-0.95%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,331.72
    -64.82 (-4.64%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,350.00
    +7.50 (+0.32%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,004.32
    +23.21 (+1.17%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6730
    -0.0330 (-0.70%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,946.70
    +334.94 (+2.15%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    15.09
    -0.28 (-1.82%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,139.83
    +60.97 (+0.75%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6839
    +0.0018 (+0.26%)
     

Is Methanex Corporation's (TSE:MX) 4.1% Dividend Worth Your Time?

Could Methanex Corporation (TSE:MX) be an attractive dividend share to own for the long haul? Investors are often drawn to strong companies with the idea of reinvesting the dividends. Unfortunately, it's common for investors to be enticed in by the seemingly attractive yield, and lose money when the company has to cut its dividend payments.

With Methanex yielding 4.1% and having paid a dividend for over 10 years, many investors likely find the company quite interesting. It would not be a surprise to discover that many investors buy it for the dividends. During the year, the company also conducted a buyback equivalent to around 4.9% of its market capitalisation. Before you buy any stock for its dividend however, you should always remember Warren Buffett's two rules: 1) Don't lose money, and 2) Remember rule #1. We'll run through some checks below to help with this.

Explore this interactive chart for our latest analysis on Methanex!

TSX:MX Historical Dividend Yield, December 5th 2019
TSX:MX Historical Dividend Yield, December 5th 2019

Payout ratios

Companies (usually) pay dividends out of their earnings. If a company is paying more than it earns, the dividend might have to be cut. Comparing dividend payments to a company's net profit after tax is a simple way of reality-checking whether a dividend is sustainable. Methanex paid out 44% of its profit as dividends, over the trailing twelve month period. This is a medium payout level that leaves enough capital in the business to fund opportunities that might arise, while also rewarding shareholders. One of the risks is that management reinvests the retained capital poorly instead of paying a higher dividend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Another important check we do is to see if the free cash flow generated is sufficient to pay the dividend. Methanex paid out a conservative 33% of its free cash flow as dividends last year. It's encouraging to see that the dividend is covered by both profit and cash flow. This generally suggests the dividend is sustainable, as long as earnings don't drop precipitously.

Is Methanex's Balance Sheet Risky?

As Methanex has a meaningful amount of debt, we need to check its balance sheet to see if the company might have debt risks. A rough way to check this is with these two simple ratios: a) net debt divided by EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation), and b) net interest cover. Net debt to EBITDA is a measure of a company's total debt. Net interest cover measures the ability to meet interest payments. Essentially we check that a) the company does not have too much debt, and b) that it can afford to pay the interest. With net debt of 2.17 times its EBITDA, Methanex has a noticeable amount of debt, although if business stays steady, this may not be overly concerning.

We calculated its interest cover by measuring its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT), and dividing this by the company's net interest expense. Interest cover of 3.16 times its interest expense is starting to become a concern for Methanex, and be aware that lenders may place additional restrictions on the company as well.

Remember, you can always get a snapshot of Methanex's latest financial position, by checking our visualisation of its financial health.

Dividend Volatility

One of the major risks of relying on dividend income, is the potential for a company to struggle financially and cut its dividend. Not only is your income cut, but the value of your investment declines as well - nasty. Methanex has been paying dividends for a long time, but for the purpose of this analysis, we only examine the past 10 years of payments. The dividend has been stable over the past 10 years, which is great. We think this could suggest some resilience to the business and its dividends. During the past ten-year period, the first annual payment was US$0.62 in 2009, compared to US$1.44 last year. Dividends per share have grown at approximately 8.8% per year over this time.

Companies like this, growing their dividend at a decent rate, can be very valuable over the long term, if the rate of growth can be maintained.

Dividend Growth Potential

While dividend payments have been relatively reliable, it would also be nice if earnings per share (EPS) were growing, as this is essential to maintaining the dividend's purchasing power over the long term. In the last five years, Methanex's earnings per share have shrunk at approximately 2.0% per annum. If earnings continue to decline, the dividend may come under pressure. Every investor should make an assessment of whether the company is taking steps to stabilise the situation.

Conclusion

Dividend investors should always want to know if a) a company's dividends are affordable, b) if there is a track record of consistent payments, and c) if the dividend is capable of growing. It's great to see that Methanex is paying out a low percentage of its earnings and cash flow. Second, earnings per share have actually shrunk, but at least the dividends have been relatively stable. Methanex has a number of positive attributes, but it falls slightly short of our (admittedly high) standards. Were there evidence of a strong moat or an attractive valuation, it could still be well worth a look.

Given that earnings are not growing, the dividend does not look nearly so attractive. Businesses can change though, and we think it would make sense to see what analysts are forecasting for the company.

If you are a dividend investor, you might also want to look at our curated list of dividend stocks yielding above 3%.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.