Advertisement
Canada markets close in 17 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,968.66
    +83.28 (+0.38%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,104.99
    +56.57 (+1.12%)
     
  • DOW

    38,262.32
    +176.52 (+0.46%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7319
    -0.0004 (-0.06%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.63
    +0.06 (+0.07%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    87,228.74
    -997.13 (-1.13%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,331.68
    -64.86 (-4.64%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,349.20
    +6.70 (+0.29%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,002.36
    +21.24 (+1.07%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6690
    -0.0370 (-0.79%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,944.56
    +332.80 (+2.13%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    14.93
    -0.44 (-2.86%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,139.83
    +60.97 (+0.75%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6839
    +0.0018 (+0.26%)
     

What Kind Of Shareholder Appears On The CHAR Technologies Ltd.'s (CVE:YES) Shareholder Register?

If you want to know who really controls CHAR Technologies Ltd. (CVE:YES), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.'

CHAR Technologies is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of CA$7.2m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. In the chart below below, we can see that institutions are not on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about YES.

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!

Check out our latest analysis for CHAR Technologies

TSXV:YES Ownership Summary, May 25th 2019
TSXV:YES Ownership Summary, May 25th 2019

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CHAR Technologies?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

ADVERTISEMENT

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to fund under management, so the institition does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. CHAR Technologies's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

TSXV:YES Income Statement, May 25th 2019
TSXV:YES Income Statement, May 25th 2019

CHAR Technologies is not owned by hedge funds. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

Insider Ownership Of CHAR Technologies

The definition of company insiders can be subjective, and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in CHAR Technologies Ltd.. Insiders have a CA$2.5m stake in this CA$7.2m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, mostly retail investors, hold a substantial 66% stake in YES, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this size of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to decline an acquisition or merger that may not improve profitability.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow for free .

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.