Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    21,875.79
    -66.41 (-0.30%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,475.09
    +14.61 (+0.27%)
     
  • DOW

    39,169.52
    +50.66 (+0.13%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7279
    -0.0032 (-0.44%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.47
    +1.93 (+2.37%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    86,879.08
    +1,728.76 (+2.03%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,349.34
    +47.27 (+3.63%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,342.20
    +2.60 (+0.11%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,030.07
    -17.62 (-0.86%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4790
    +0.1360 (+3.13%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,879.30
    +146.70 (+0.83%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    12.10
    -0.34 (-2.73%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,166.76
    +2.64 (+0.03%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,631.06
    +47.98 (+0.12%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6775
    -0.0045 (-0.66%)
     

Institutional investors control 71% of RxSight, Inc. (NASDAQ:RXST) and were rewarded last week after stock increased 6.0%

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in RxSight implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders

  • Insiders have bought recently

If you want to know who really controls RxSight, Inc. (NASDAQ:RXST), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$2.3b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 109% and last week’s gain was the icing on the cake.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of RxSight.

See our latest analysis for RxSight

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RxSight?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that RxSight does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see RxSight's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in RxSight. The company's largest shareholder is RA Capital Management, L.P., with ownership of 8.8%. With 5.4% and 4.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Artisan Partners Limited Partnership are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Ronald Kurtz, the CEO has 2.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of RxSight

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

We can report that insiders do own shares in RxSight, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$115m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over RxSight. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Equity Ownership

With a stake of 8.8%, private equity firms could influence the RxSight board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for RxSight that you should be aware of.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com