Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    24,072.51
    -30.20 (-0.13%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,751.13
    +55.19 (+0.97%)
     
  • DOW

    42,080.37
    +126.13 (+0.30%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7322
    -0.0007 (-0.09%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    73.81
    +0.24 (+0.33%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    85,153.52
    -394.51 (-0.46%)
     
  • XRP CAD

    0.73
    -0.00 (-0.01%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,636.20
    +0.80 (+0.03%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,194.98
    +1.89 (+0.09%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.0330
    +0.0070 (+0.17%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    20,246.75
    -51.75 (-0.25%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    21.42
    -1.22 (-5.39%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,190.61
    -113.01 (-1.36%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,178.70
    +241.16 (+0.62%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6671
    -0.0001 (-0.01%)
     

Institutional investors control 69% of Merus N.V. (NASDAQ:MRUS) and were rewarded last week after stock increased 5.5%

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Merus' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • 52% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders

  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business

A look at the shareholders of Merus N.V. (NASDAQ:MRUS) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 69% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$3.7b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 113%.

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Merus.

Check out our latest analysis for Merus

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Merus?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

We can see that Merus does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Merus, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 13% of Merus. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is Commodore Capital LP, with ownership of 6.6%. RTW Investments, LP is the second largest shareholder owning 6.2% of common stock, and Incyte Corporation holds about 6.0% of the company stock.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Merus

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Merus N.V.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$22m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Public Company Ownership

It appears to us that public companies own 6.0% of Merus. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Merus .

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com