Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    21,875.79
    -66.37 (-0.30%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,460.48
    -22.39 (-0.41%)
     
  • DOW

    39,118.86
    -45.20 (-0.12%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7312
    +0.0011 (+0.15%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    81.46
    -0.28 (-0.34%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    82,578.27
    -1,756.88 (-2.08%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,257.27
    -26.55 (-2.07%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,336.90
    +0.30 (+0.01%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,047.69
    +9.35 (+0.46%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3430
    +0.0550 (+1.28%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,732.60
    -126.08 (-0.71%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    12.44
    +0.20 (+1.63%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,164.12
    -15.56 (-0.19%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,583.08
    +241.54 (+0.61%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6820
    +0.0003 (+0.04%)
     

Individual investors account for 54% of Victoria Gold Corp.'s (TSE:VGCX) ownership, while institutions account for 33%

Key Insights

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Victoria Gold indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy

  • 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders

  • Insiders have bought recently

If you want to know who really controls Victoria Gold Corp. (TSE:VGCX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is individual investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Meanwhile, institutions make up 33% of the company’s shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Victoria Gold, beginning with the chart below.

Check out our latest analysis for Victoria Gold

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Victoria Gold?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

Victoria Gold already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Victoria Gold's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

It would appear that 10% of Victoria Gold shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is GMT Capital Corp. with 10% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 3.4% and 3.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO John McConnell is the owner of 1.3% of the company's shares.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Victoria Gold

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

We can see that insiders own shares in Victoria Gold Corp.. In their own names, insiders own CA$14m worth of stock in the CA$494m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 54% of Victoria Gold. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Victoria Gold better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Victoria Gold has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com