Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    22,227.63
    -495.58 (-2.18%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,346.56
    -100.12 (-1.84%)
     
  • DOW

    39,737.26
    -610.71 (-1.51%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7209
    -0.0001 (-0.02%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    74.14
    -3.77 (-4.84%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    82,332.66
    -3,399.83 (-3.97%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,308.28
    -13.49 (-1.02%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,486.10
    +5.30 (+0.21%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,109.31
    -76.85 (-3.52%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.7920
    -0.1840 (-4.63%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    16,776.16
    -417.98 (-2.43%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    23.39
    +4.80 (+25.82%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,174.71
    -108.65 (-1.31%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    35,909.70
    -2,216.63 (-5.81%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6606
    -0.0072 (-1.08%)
     

Individual investors account for 35% of BARK, Inc.'s (NYSE:BARK) ownership, while institutions account for 29%

Key Insights

  • BARK's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public

  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership

  • Recent purchases by insiders

A look at the shareholders of BARK, Inc. (NYSE:BARK) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 35% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Meanwhile, institutions make up 29% of the company’s shareholders. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about BARK.

See our latest analysis for BARK

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About BARK?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in BARK. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at BARK's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in BARK. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is RRE Ventures LLC with 13% of shares outstanding. With 7.4% and 6.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Carly Strife and Henrik Werdelin are the second and third largest shareholders. Note that the second and third-largest shareholders are also Top Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, meaning that the company's top shareholders are insiders. Additionally, the company's CEO Matt Meeker directly holds 5.7% of the total shares outstanding.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of BARK

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of BARK, Inc.. Insiders have a US$62m stake in this US$288m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over BARK. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Equity Ownership

With an ownership of 13%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand BARK better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - BARK has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com