Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    24,224.90
    +152.39 (+0.63%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,792.04
    +40.91 (+0.71%)
     
  • DOW

    42,512.00
    +431.63 (+1.03%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7298
    -0.0031 (-0.42%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    73.33
    -0.24 (-0.33%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    82,823.85
    -2,616.93 (-3.06%)
     
  • XRP CAD

    0.72
    -0.01 (-1.51%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,626.80
    -8.60 (-0.33%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,200.59
    +5.60 (+0.26%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.0670
    +0.0340 (+0.84%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    20,441.25
    +142.75 (+0.70%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    20.86
    -0.56 (-2.61%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,243.74
    +53.13 (+0.65%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,277.96
    +340.42 (+0.87%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6671
    -0.0001 (-0.02%)
     

A great week that adds to FirstService Corporation's (TSE:FSV) one-year returns, institutional investors who own 69% must be happy

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies FirstService's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders

  • Insiders have sold recently

A look at the shareholders of FirstService Corporation (TSE:FSV) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 69% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained CA$593m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 5.7%.

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of FirstService, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for FirstService

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FirstService?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

FirstService already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see FirstService's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.7% of FirstService. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data suggests that Jay Hennick, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 6.8%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. Durable Capital Partners, LP is the second largest shareholder owning 6.7% of common stock, and Manulife Asset Management holds about 5.7% of the company stock.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of FirstService

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in FirstService Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own CA$808m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand FirstService better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for FirstService you should know about.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com