Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    24,471.17
    +168.91 (+0.70%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,815.03
    +34.98 (+0.61%)
     
  • DOW

    42,863.86
    +409.74 (+0.97%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7266
    -0.0011 (-0.16%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    75.49
    -0.36 (-0.47%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    86,659.25
    +38.31 (+0.04%)
     
  • XRP CAD

    0.74
    -0.00 (-0.15%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,674.20
    +34.90 (+1.32%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,234.41
    +45.99 (+2.10%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.0730
    -0.0230 (-0.56%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    18,342.94
    +60.89 (+0.33%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    20.46
    -0.47 (-2.25%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,253.65
    +15.92 (+0.19%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,605.80
    +224.91 (+0.57%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6642
    -0.0011 (-0.17%)
     

Fortinet, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:FTNT) latest 6.3% decline adds to one-year losses, institutional investors may consider drastic measures

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Fortinet's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • 51% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders

  • Insiders own 16% of Fortinet

A look at the shareholders of Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ:FTNT) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 69% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 6.3% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 2.4% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in Fortinet's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Fortinet.

View our latest analysis for Fortinet

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fortinet?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Fortinet does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Fortinet, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Fortinet. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.8% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.3% and 7.5% of the stock. Interestingly, the bottom two of the top three shareholders also hold the title of Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, suggesting that these insiders have a personal stake in the company.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Fortinet

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Fortinet, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$52b, and insiders have US$8.3b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fortinet better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Fortinet (at least 1 which is concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.