Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    22,244.02
    +20.35 (+0.09%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,537.02
    +28.01 (+0.51%)
     
  • DOW

    39,308.00
    -23.90 (-0.06%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7348
    +0.0001 (+0.02%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.72
    -0.16 (-0.19%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    77,000.48
    -3,295.41 (-4.10%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,183.37
    -77.81 (-6.17%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,369.40
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,036.62
    +2.75 (+0.14%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3550
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    20,411.50
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    12.26
    +0.17 (+1.41%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,241.26
    +70.14 (+0.86%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    41,051.49
    +137.84 (+0.34%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6790
    -0.0002 (-0.03%)
     

Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ:FTNT) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 70% of the company

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Fortinet's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • 16% of Fortinet is held by insiders

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ:FTNT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 70% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fortinet, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Fortinet

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fortinet?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Fortinet. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Fortinet's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Fortinet. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.8%. Ken Xie is the second largest shareholder owning 8.3% of common stock, and Michael Xie holds about 7.4% of the company stock. Note that the second and third-largest shareholders are also Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, meaning that the company's top shareholders are insiders.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Fortinet

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Fortinet, Inc.. Insiders own US$8.5b worth of shares in the US$54b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Fortinet (1 can't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.