Yahoo Finance Economist rejects BlackRock CEO Larry Fink's suggestion that people work longer to solve the retirement crisis
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink caused quite a stir when he suggested America could dodge its looming “retirement crisis” by encouraging people to continue working past age 65.
The billionaire, who chairs the world's largest asset manager, kicked off his 2024 annual letter to shareholders by telling his readers it is “time to rethink retirement.”
Don't miss
Commercial real estate has beaten the stock market for 25 years — but only the super rich could buy in. Here's how even ordinary investors can become the landlord of Walmart, Whole Foods or Kroger
Cost-of-living in America is still out of control — use these 3 'real assets' to protect your wealth today, no matter what the US Fed does or says
These 5 magic money moves will boost you up America's net worth ladder in 2024 — and you can complete each step within minutes. Here's how
He raised the point that more Americans are retiring and their retirements are increasing by length. This, he claims, is having a “massive impact on the country’s retirement system” — specifically the nation’s Social Security coffers, which are quickly running out of money.
“What’s the solution here?” Fink pondered in his letter. “No one should have to work longer than they want to. But I do think it’s a bit crazy that our anchor idea for the right retirement age — 65 years old — originates from the time of the Ottoman Empire.”
Fink never claimed to have the answer, but he did suggest that encouraging Americans to work for longer “with carrots rather than sticks” may help alleviate certain retirement-related economic challenges. But not everyone agrees.
Labor economist Teresa Ghilarducci, a renowned thought-leader on U.S. retirement issues, slapped down Fink’s suggestion in a recent interview with Bloomberg's Sonali Basak.
“If you think, Mr. Fink, that people working longer — maybe just one year or two years longer — will mean that people won’t go into their old age without being downwardly mobile into poverty after being a middle class worker, or you think working longer will maintain people’s living standards, you’ll be wrong,” she said. Here’s why Ghilarducci is against raising the retirement age.
It’s not fair
Ghilarducci thinks people need to dive deeper into the data around American life expectancy and how that relates to working longevity.
“Not everyone is living longer,” she stressed. “There is a slice of the population that have had good healthcare [and] have had the kinds of jobs that enhance their health and their wellbeing and their skills. They’re living longer.
“But there are some parts of our economy, of our America, where actually the longevity is going down. Deaths of despair, the suicides, the opioid addiction [and] even the kinds of jobs that people have are shortening their lives.”
Ghilarducci claims this “inequality” in society makes this common “live longer, work longer” argument impossible for a large portion of Americans.
Read more: Rich young Americans have lost confidence in the stock market — and are betting on these assets instead. Get in now for strong long-term tailwinds
Specifically, she highlighted the plight of older workers in pink collar jobs (care-oriented careers, historically considered to be women’s work) and “light” blue collar jobs that may require a lot of engagement with a computer.
“The service sector — taking care of older people, taking care of children — that requires a lot of heavy lifting, a lot of stooping and bending, a lot of physical activity and those jobs break bodies down,” Ghilarducci explained.
“The computer has made some aspects of jobs easier, [especially] on the knees, but the requirements for intense concentration, keen eyesight and actually being able to speed up your work because of increased surveillance has actually made those jobs harder too.”
Ghilarducci claims the jobs older Americans often have “can raise cortisol levels, increase inflammation and cause more metabolic disorders and early death.” As a result, she says making them work for longer is not a viable solution to the nation’s retirement challenges.
Some don’t have a choice
One part of America’s so-called “retirement crisis” that Ghilarducci thinks experts — “including Larry Fink” — overlook is the fact that “most people cannot decide when they retire.”
She highlighted the difference between someone choosing to “retire” at a certain age, versus being forcefully “retired” by an employer due to age or waning workplace abilities.
According to a 2018 Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis report, 52% of older workers claimed they were forced into involuntary retirement.
Ghilarducci cited that 52% stat in the Bloomberg interview, saying that older Americans are often “forced to retire” because of health issues — like bad knees, metabolic disorders and stress — or to take care of their aging spouse.
“This idea that workers can just decide to work longer is a myth because most people cannot decide whether or not to work or not,” she stressed.
While you may not have much choice over your employment later in life, there are things you can control, such as: how you manage your finances, when you decide to take Social Security, and how you save and invest your money so that you have enough to live off during your retirement.
If you’re not sure where to start, consider seeking guidance from a financial adviser, who can help you come up with a plan that helps you hit your retirement goals.
What to read next
Car insurance premiums in America are through the roof — and only getting worse. But 5 minutes could have you paying as little as $29/month
‘Baby boomers bust': Robert Kiyosaki warns that older Americans will get crushed in the 'biggest bubble in history' — 3 shockproof assets for instant insurance now
The 5 most expensive mistakes in options trading and how to avoid them
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
