Advertisement
Canada markets close in 28 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,976.12
    +90.74 (+0.41%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,110.07
    +61.65 (+1.22%)
     
  • DOW

    38,294.32
    +208.52 (+0.55%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7321
    -0.0002 (-0.03%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.71
    +0.14 (+0.17%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    87,324.17
    -1,104.57 (-1.25%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,332.34
    -64.19 (-4.60%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,348.60
    +6.10 (+0.26%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,003.18
    +22.06 (+1.11%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6690
    -0.0370 (-0.79%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,958.36
    +346.60 (+2.22%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    14.97
    -0.40 (-2.60%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,139.83
    +60.97 (+0.75%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6838
    +0.0017 (+0.25%)
     

Dogfighting in an F-35 is 'like having a knife fight in a telephone booth'

f35a
f35a

(If you're dogfighting in an F-35, "somebody made a mistake," Rahill said.US Air Force photo)

Civilian pilot Adam Alpert of the Vermont Air National Guard wrote an interesting and enjoyable article on his training experience with the vaunted F-35 in a mock mission to take out nuclear facilities in North Korea.

Chief among the interesting points in the article is a quote from Alpert's instructor pilot, Lt. Col. John Rahill, about the F-35's dogfighting ability.

Speaking about the nuanced technical and tactical differences between the F-35, the future plane of the VANG, and the F-16, the VANG's current plane, Rahill said this:

ADVERTISEMENT

"If you get into a dogfight with the F-35, somebody made a mistake. It's like having a knife fight in a telephone booth — very unpredictable."

The F-35 has been criticized for its dogfighting abilities. But as more information comes to light about the F-35's mission and purpose, it becomes clearer that measuring the F-35 by its ability to dogfight doesn't make much more sense than measuring a rifle by its capability as a melee weapon.

"The pilot uses onboard long-range sensors and weapons to destroy the enemy aircraft before ever being seen. The combination of stealth and superior electronic warfare systems makes the F-35 both more lethal and safer," said Rahill, according to Alpert.

In Alpert's mock mission to North Korea, planners sent only four planes, two F-35s and two F-22s, instead of the older formation of F-18s for electronic attacks, F-15s for air dominance, F-16s for bombing, and airborne early warning radar planes. Altogether, the older formation totals about 75 lives at risk versus four pilots at risk with the F-35 version.

f35 and f16
f35 and f16

(Mission planners could risk four airmen in fifth-generation planes or up to 75 in legacy aircraft when embarking on dangerous missions.US Air Force)

Alpert's piece highlights many of the ways in which the F-35 outclasses the F-16 with an easier, more intuitive interface that allows pilots to focus more on the mission and less on the machine. In fact, Alpert compares the F-35's controls to an "elaborate video game" with a variety of apps he can call up seamlessly to access any relevant information — including an indicator that tells him how stealthy he is.

Read the full article by Alpert at SevenDaysVT.com »

NOW WATCH: The F-35 has hit another snag — this time because it’s too stealthy



More From Business Insider