Advertisement
Canada markets close in 5 hours 8 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    22,523.21
    +57.84 (+0.26%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,312.59
    +4.46 (+0.08%)
     
  • DOW

    39,849.52
    +42.75 (+0.11%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7330
    -0.0012 (-0.16%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    79.34
    -0.46 (-0.58%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    96,088.19
    +4,876.76 (+5.35%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,539.12
    +50.58 (+3.41%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,431.60
    -6.90 (-0.28%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,099.73
    -2.77 (-0.13%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4100
    -0.0270 (-0.61%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    16,787.37
    -7.51 (-0.04%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    12.16
    +0.01 (+0.08%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,420.53
    -3.67 (-0.04%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,946.93
    -122.75 (-0.31%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6747
    -0.0009 (-0.13%)
     

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDNS) is favoured by institutional owners who hold 87% of the company

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Cadence Design Systems' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • 51% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders

  • Recent sales by insiders

A look at the shareholders of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDNS) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 87% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cadence Design Systems, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for Cadence Design Systems

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cadence Design Systems?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Cadence Design Systems. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cadence Design Systems, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cadence Design Systems. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. With 9.0% and 4.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Cadence Design Systems

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$701m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cadence Design Systems. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cadence Design Systems better, we need to consider many other factors.

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.