Yahoo Finance The Best and Worst Cities to Own Investment Property
Across the United States, home prices are rising fast, especially because available inventory is low throughout the nation. In some cities, prices are reaching levels not seen since the before the financial crisis.
With wages remaining fairly steady, the rise in home prices is bad news for homebuyers — but good news for investors. To determine which cities are the best and worst for owning investment property — that is, owning property to rent out to tenants — GOBankingRates surveyed 67 of the 100 most populous cities in the U.S.
The study used four main factors to evaluate each city: employment growth, population growth, increase in home values and rental yield. It turns out that the country’s biggest cities aren’t necessarily the best places to own investment property.
Home prices are rising across the United States, especially since available inventory is low across the nation. In some cities, they’re reaching levels not seen since the before the financial crisis.
With wages remaining fairly steady, the rise in home prices is bad news for home buyers — but good news for investors. In this study, GOBankingRates.com surveyed 67 of the 100 most populous cities in the U.S. to determine which cities are the best and worst for owning investment property — that is, owning property to rent out to tenants. The study used four main factors to evaluate each city:
Employment growth: The percent change in the city’s number of employed people year-over-year.
Population growth: The percent change in the city’s population year-over-year.
Increase in home values: The percent change in the city’s median home value year-over-year.
Rental yield: The percentage value of rental income compared to the property’s market value
Click through to see where you should invest in real estate — and where you shouldn’t.
The 20 Worst Cities to Own Investment Property
The cities that made the bottom of our list have many factors in common. Whether it’s a falling population, poor employment growth or stagnant home values, these 20 cities are the worst cities to own real estate.
20. Portland, Ore.
Population growth: 2.9%
Employment growth: 2.3%
Increase in home values: 1.1%
Rental yield: 4.7%
Portland suffers from a mixed-bag of good and bad numbers for key factors, which help place it at No. 20 among the worst cities to own investment property. Property is relatively expensive, the average home listing price being $469,000. Based on a median rent of $1,848, it’d take over decades for rental income to pay off buy-in.
19. Corpus Christi, Texas
Population growth: 0.8%
Employment growth: -0.9%
Increase in home values: 3.4%
Rental yield: 7.6%
Texas is well-represented in this study, with three cities ranking among the best cities to own investment property. Unfortunately, in the case of Corpus Christi, it’s being recognized for being home to one of the worst cities to own investment property.
The biggest drags on Corpus Christi are weak population growth, stagnating home values and employment that declined year-over-year.
18. San Diego
Population growth: 2.2%
Employment growth: 2.2%
Increase in home values: 7.1%
Rental yield: 4.4%
San Diego sneaks into the bottom of our list at No. 18. Although the city experienced healthy population growth, employment grew less than average. The very expensive cost of buying a home makes paying off the cost of owning property difficult. San Diego’s 4.4 percent rental yield is one of the worst in the study, and it would take close to 23 years for rental income to pay off a property. [Tab: All Data | Column Q – Rental Yield: tied for 4th lowest | Column S – Years to pay off (i.e. listing price via rental income): 22.7 years]
17. Cincinnati
Population growth: 0.1%
Employment growth: 1.1%
Increase in home values: 7.5%
Rental yield: 6.6%
Like many cities in America’s “old Midwest”, Cincinnati has had to deal with stagnating, if not outright declining, population and employment growth. On the Brightside, Cincinnati is one the top U.S. cities where you can own a home for $1,000 a month or less.
16. San Francisco
Population growth: 2.0%
Employment growth: 1.8%
Increase in home values: 9.8%
Rental yield: 4.1%
The biggest drawback for San Francisco is your buy-in, aka the city’s absurd $1.25 million median listing price. Even with a median rent of $4,219, the rental yield is small and it’d take close to 25 years to pay off. [Tab: All Data | Column L – Listing price: $1,249,888 | Column S – Years to pay off: 24.7 years]
Find Out: 13 Ways California Real Estate Differs From Every Other State
15. Boston
Population growth: 2.1%
Employment growth: 1.6%
Increase in home values: 7.5%
Rental yield: 4.4%
Boston also has a steep buy-in, $725,000 being the median price for all homes. Even with fairly expensive median rent of $2,629, the rental yield is a mere 4.4 percent. At that rate, it’d take you 23 years for rental income to pay off. [Tab: All Data | Column L – Listing price: $725,000 | Column P – Rental Yield: tied for 4th lowest | Column S – Years to pay off: 23 years]
Find Out: Do You Work Enough to Afford a Home in America’s 25 Largest Cities?
14. Wichita, Kan.
Population growth: 0.4%
Employment growth: 1.0%
Increase in home values: 5.5%
Rental yield: 6.1%
Employment growth in Wichita is sluggish, increasing by only 1 percent year-over-year. The median home value grew just 5.5 percent over the same period, which is quite low. And though home prices favor the prospective property owner, rents do not: Wichita’s $886 median rent is the third lowest in the study. [Tab: All Data | Column L – Listing price: $174,900 | Column N – Rent: $886, 3rd lowest]
13. Baton Rouge, La.
Population growth: -0.5%
Employment growth: 0.7%
Increase in home values: 9.9%
Rental yield: 7.1%
Baton Rouge is held back by less-than-average growth in home values and employment. Even worse, the city’s population dropped in absolute terms year-over-year. On the positive side, it is one of the main U.S. cities where home prices are falling.
12. Virginia Beach
Population growth: 0.3%
Employment growth: 0.7%
Increase in home values: 1.6%
Rental yield: 6.2%
Virginia Beach ranks among the worst cities to own investment property largely due to poor population numbers and less-than-one-percent employment growth, not to mention a meager 1.6 percent increase in home values. These factors, along with others such as mortgage delinquency, make it one of America’s most notable cities in danger of a housing crisis.
11. Los Angeles
Population growth: 1.4%
Employment growth: 1.3%
Increase in home values: 8.7%
Rental yield: 4.3%
Los Angeles is a tough city for investment property because of the very steep buy-in. The median home price is approximately $800,000. Even with a median rent of $2,881, it takes a long time to pay off and suffers from one of the lowest rental yields. So buying a home might not be the most accessible ways to survive California’s expensive housing market.
10. Louisville, Ky.
Population growth: 0.5%
Employment growth: 1.3%
Increase in home values: 5.5%
Rental yield: 5.6%
Louisville is held back by poor population growth and weak rental yield. Home values increased by a disappointing 5.5 percent year-over-year. Low rents makes it take nearly 18 years to pay off the price of the average property. [Tab: All Data | Column F – Pop. Growth: 0.5%, 14th lowest | Column P – Rental Yield: 5.62%, below average| Column S – Years to pay off: 17.8 years]
9. Pittsburgh
Population growth: 1.4%
Employment growth: 1.3%
Increase in home values: 8.7%
Rental yield: 4.3%
Pittsburgh made the worst list mainly because of its decline in population and weak rental yield. Home values increased significantly year-over-year, but Pittsburgh’s median rent of $1,135 means the payoff is low. Home prices won’t stay low, however, considering Pittsburgh is among the top 20 cities where home prices are rising fastest. [Tab: All Data | Column Q – Rental yield: 5.95% is on low-side]
8. Buffalo, N.Y.
Population growth: -1.1%
Employment growth: 1.6%
Increase in home values: 15.2%
Rental yield: 10.9%
Home prices in Buffalo are among the nation’s most affordable. But on the downside for property owners, rent is quite low too, the median being just $898. You could pay off your property in under 10 years, but with several consecutive years of declining population, the future doesn’t look bright for Buffalo.
Trending: 30 Cities Where You Can Buy a House for Under $100K
7. New Orleans
Population growth: 0.9%
Employment growth: 0.8%
Increase in home values: 2.5%
Rental yield: 5%
New Orleans’s principal weaknesses are its paltry less-than-one percent increase in employment and population over the years. Add to that a year-over-year increase of just 2.5 percent in home values and low rental yield. It’s not coincidental that New Orleans is also one of America’s cities most in danger of a housing crisis.
6. Anchorage, Alaska
Employment growth: -0.1%
Population growth: -0.3%
Increase in home values: 0.5%
Rental yield: 6.7%
Anchorage experienced the third-lowest increase in home values year-over-year. Anchorage has a better-than-average rental yield, and it would take just 13 1/2 years to pay off the property. But the city has seen very little employment growth, which could be related to the city’s outright decline in population.
5. Chicago
Population growth: -0.6%
Employment growth: 0.8%
Increase in home values: 3.0%
Rental yield: 5.9%
The Windy City is one of the worst cities to own investment property for a few reasons: Unimpressive employment growth, a shrinking population and one of the worst year-over-year changes in home values. On top of all that, Chicago is high up on the list of cities most in danger of a housing crisis.
4. Honolulu
Population growth: -0.1%
Employment growth: 1.6%
Increase in home values: 3.7%
Rental yield: 4.4%
Home values increased very little year-over-year. In addition, Honolulu’s expensive home prices compared to rents diminish rental yield significantly. As a result, it would take close to 23 years to pay off the property. [Column J – Home Values: 3.7% is 8th lowest | Column S: 22.9 years]
Related: Best Places in Every State to Get a Vacation Home
3. New York
Population growth: 0.5%
Employment growth: 1.2%
Increase in home values: 7.8%
Rental yield: 3.2%
Getting into the real estate market in the Big Apple is rather costly. You might want to avoid buying in New York, especially considering it’s one of several U.S. cities where it’s cheaper to rent.
With a median home price of $848,000, it’ll take you quite a while to pay off your property with rental income. Based on a median rent of $2,279, it’d take more than three decades to pay off the price of the home.
2. Milwaukee
Population growth: -1.5%
Employment growth: 0.8%
Increase in home values: 10.7%
Rental yield: 9.3%
Milwaukee suffered an imbalance in key factors. Its 10.7 percent rental yield is actually very solid, but it’s undermined by weak employment and population figures. Milwaukee has one of the worst year-over-year increases in employment, and its population shrank by thousands of people over the last two years. [Tab: All Data | Column H – Employment Growth: 0.8%, tied for 4th lowest | Column F: 2016-2018 = 8,732]
Trending Now: 20 Strange, Unusual Homes on the Market
1. St. Louis
Population growth: -2.2%
Employment growth: 0.9%
Increase in home values: 6.0%
Rental yield: 6.9%
St. Louis suffered from the biggest decline in population from 2016 to 2018. Employment growth year-over-year was also disappointing, less than one percent. Although St. Louis might not be ideal for a property owner looking to profit, it is one of the best cities for aspiring millennial homeowners.
The 20 Best Cities to Own Investment Property
There are some common themes when it comes to finding the best city to own investment property. Notably, Florida and Texas both have multiple cities that rank among the best places to own property for rent. Read on to find out where to invest in real estate.
20. Atlanta
Population growth: 4.0%
Employment growth: 1.7%
Increase in home values: 14.1%
Rental yield: 5.1%
Atlanta has become a boomtown in America’s southeast, home to Turner Broadcasting as well as a burgeoning tech scene. In fact, Atlanta has major potential of becoming the next Silicon Valley,
The city’s population has rose 4 percent over the last two years. And home values surged 14.1 percent year-over-year, one of the biggest jumps in the study. [Tab: All Data | Column J – Home Values: 14.1%, 7th best | Column F – Pop. Growth: 4.04% is 7th best]
19. Denver
Population growth: 3.8%
Employment growth: 2.8%
Increase in home values: 7.3%
Rental yield: 5.2%
From 2016 to 2018, Denver’s population grew close to 4 percent, while employment grew 2.8 percent from 2017 to 2018. Both rates are better-than-average, as is Denver’s median rent of $2,060, the 11th highest rent in the study. And keep in mind, Denver notably is one of a few real estate markets that beat the stock market over the last five years. [Tab: All Data | Column F and H for Pop. Growth and Employment Growth | Column N – Rent: $2,060 is 11th highest]
18. Kansas City, Mo.
Population growth: 2.7%
Employment growth: 1.5%
Increase in home values: 11.5%
Rental yield: 5%
Kansas City makes it onto the top-20 list thanks to above-average population growth and rental yield. The median home price is an affordable $200,000. Though rents could be higher, based on the median rent, you could pay off your property in just over 15 years. [Tab: All Data | Column N- Rent: $1,088, 14th lowest | Column S – Years to pay off: 15.3, on shorter side]
17. Boise, Idaho
Population growth: 2.6%
Employment growth: 3.6%
Increase in home values: 13.3%
Rental yield: 5.2%
Boise boasts the largest growth in employment year-over-year, as well as healthy population growth. Appreciation in home values is encouraging, but rental yields remain on the low side in Boise, contributing to its No. 19 spot overall. [Tab: All Data | Column H – Employment Growth: 3.6, 1st place | Column Q – Rental Yield: 48 out of 64]
Find Out: How Much Home You Can Buy for $300,000 in Your State
16. Fort Wayne, Ind.
Population growth: 1.3%
Employment growth: 1.8%
Increase in home values: 9%
Rental yield: 7.64%
Fort Wayne made our list of the best cities to invest in real estate 2016, 2017 and ranks again this year. Lucky for prospective buyers, it’s one of the principal cities where home prices are falling.
With a median home price of $159,900, property is quite affordable in Fort Wayne. Even with a rent of only $1,018 a month, you’d still pay off your property in a little over 13 years, faster than in most cities. [Tab: All Data | Column L – Listing price: $159,900 is 6th cheapest | Column S – Years to pay off: 13.1 years is 7th best]
15. Durham, N.C.
Population growth: 4.2%
Employment growth: 1.4%
Increase in home values: 11.7%
Rental yield: 5.6%
Durham is the one of two North Carolina cities to make our list of the best cities to buy investment property. The city’s 4.2 percent growth in population is one of the highest rates. Home values rose 11.7 percent year-over-year and are expected to rise another 2.9 percent within the year.[FC]
Don’t Miss: What a $1M Home Looks Like Across America
14. Madison, Wisc.
Population growth: 3.1%
Employment growth: 1.1%
Increase in home values: 9.6%
Rental yield: 6%
Wisconsin’s capital city fared much better than Milwaukee in our study of the best cities to own investment property. Where Milwaukee’s population fell, Madison’s grew more than 3 percent in the last two years. Plus, affordable home prices yet higher rents make for solid rental yield, and only 15 years to pay off your property. [All Data: Column F – Pop. Growth: Madison’s 3.1% vs. Milwaukee’s -1.5% | Column L and N – Listing Price and Rent: $247,900 and $1,514 | Rental yield: 6.6% and 15.1 years to pay off]
Don’t Miss: These Cities Have the Most Million-Dollar Homes for Sale
13. Austin, Texas
Population growth: 3.7%
Employment growth: 3.3%
Increase in home values: 7.8%
Rental yield: 5.3%
Austin’s population growth exceeded fellow Texan city San Antonio’s, but Austin ranks slightly lower overall due to weaker home value appreciation and lower rental yield. If you’re a potential homebuyer, Austin is one of 15 cities where homes are getting cheaper.
12. San Antonio
Population growth: 3.3%
Employment growth: 2.2%
Increase in home values: 8%
Rental yield: 6.4%
A booming economy and solid population growth make San Antonio an attractive city in which to own real estate. From 2016 to 2018, its population grew at a rate of 3.3 percent, which is better-than-average, as is its year-over-year employment growth. Related, San Antonio also ranks among the best cities to invest in a condo. [Tab: All Data | Columns F and H for Pop. Growth and Employment Growth]
11. Las Vegas
Population growth: 3.3%
Employment growth: 2.8%
Increase in home values: 15.9%
Rental yield: 5.3%
Sin City saw healthy growth across the board. The city’s 3.3 percent population growth over two years is the biggest, and its employment growth is better-than-average.
Another huge win for Las Vegas is its home value appreciation year-over-year, which is almost 16 percent. However, you’ll need to act quickly and buy because it’s one of the top cities where home prices are increasing in America.
10. St. Petersburg, Fla.
Population growth: 3.3%
Employment growth: 2.3%
Increase in home values: 14.6%
Rental yield: 5.6%
Like Tampa, St. Petersburg employment grew 2.3 percent, and its population growth was very solid as well. But St. Petersburg edged out Tampa with a 14.6 percent rise in home values, one of the best in the study. And if you’re looking to act fast and buy in, St. Petersburg is one of the top U.S. cities where home prices are getting slashed.
9. Tampa, Fla.
Population growth: 4.6%
Employment growth: 2.3%
Increase in home values: 13%
Rental yield: 5.1%
Tampa finished among the best cities to invest in real estate for the third year in a row. The population grew by more than 4.6 percent over the last two years, and its 2.3 percent employment growth is better-than-average. These factors have helped Tampa’s housing market outperform the S&P 500 in recent years.
8. Charlotte, N.C.
Population growth: 3.7%
Employment growth: 2.7%
Increase in home values: 11.9%
Rental yield: 5.5%
Charlotte is another hotspot of the U.S. South, experiencing solid 3.7 percent population growth over the last two years. Even better, employment in Charlotte grew by 2.7 percent from 2017 to 2018. Though the rental yield is less than average, home values rose nearly 12 percent since last year. With so much going for it, Charlotte also ranks among the 30 hottest cities for new businesses.
7. Phoenix
Population growth: 4%
Employment growth: 3.1%
Increase in home values: 9.6%
Rental yield: 5.4%
Rental property owners in Phoenix will find favorable conditions such as one of the highest rates of population growth and better-than-average employment growth too. The city has been experiencing a major boom in recent years, but success has consequences. Phoenix is now one of 10 places in the U.S. where the cost of living will soar.
6. Seattle
Population growth: 5.9%
Employment growth: 3.3%
Increase in home values: 11.3%
Rental yield: 4.1%
A leading factor making Seattle one of best cities for real estate investment is its surging population. With an increase of 5.9 percent from 2016 to 2018, Seattle has the highest rate of growth overall. Seattle also boasts the one of greatest year-over-year increases in employment. Perhaps it’s no surprise that it’s one of the cities that survived the Great Recession.
5. Columbus, Ohio
Population growth: 2.3%
Employment growth: 1.2%
Increase in home values: 9.2%
Rental yield: 7.9%
Columbus home values experienced better-than-average growth year-over-year. Another key benefit for property owners is comparatively high rent prices versus the cost to buy the property. With a median list price of $179,900 and median rent of $1,184, Columbus has the sixth-highest rental yield and takes less than 13 years to pay off the property.
Find Out How to Profit: The Best States for House Flipping
4. Colorado Springs
Population growth: 4.1%
Employment growth: 3%
Increase in home values: 10.3%
Rental yield: 5.6%
Colorado Springs is buoyed by big population growth, an impressive 4.1 percent from 2016 to 2018. This bodes well for an enterprising property owner, not to mention the city’s solid year-over-year increase in employment. However, you’ll have to hurry and buy in because Colorado Springs is one of 20 cities where cost of living is rising fastest.
3. Jacksonville, Fla.
Population growth: 3.1%
Employment growth: 3.2%
Increase in home values: 10.1%
Rental yield: 6.8%
Florida seems to be where to invest in real estate in 2018 and beyond. Jacksonville is one of five cities making it into the top 20.
With a 3.2 percent growth in employment in one year and 3.1 percent increase in population over two years, Jacksonville is conducive to prospective property owners. Its rental yield is better-than-average as well. It’s no coincidence Jacksonville is also one of the best cities to buy a condo as an investment.
2. Orlando, Fla.
Population growth: 4.8%
Employment growth: 3.5%
Increase in home values: 10.7%
Rental yield: 5.7%
For the third year in a row, Orlando is among the top-five. But for the first time, it’s no longer the No. 1 best place to invest in property. Orlando’s 4.8 percent increase in population is beaten only by Seattle and Miami’s growth. And, Orlando’s employment growth is second behind only Seattle, making it the runner-up for the best cities to own investment property.
Trending: Real Estate Investment Trust Strategies to Try This Year
1. Arlington, Texas
Population growth: 2.2%
Employment growth: 3.4%
Increase in home values: 10.3%
Rental yield: 7.5%
Arlington takes the No. 1 spot in our study of where to buy investment property in the U.S. Over the last two years, the city has sustained healthy population growth. Plus, its 3.4 percent year-over-year rise in employment is among the best. [All Data | Column H – Employment Growth: 3.4, tied for 3rd best]
In addition to that, Arlington’s median home price of $240,000 is on the affordable side, yet rents are comparatively high at $1,498. This makes for a strong rental yield and the ability to pay off your property in a little over 13 years. Altogether, this makes Arlington the best city to own investment property. [All Data | Column L and N for Listing Price and Rent | Column Q – Rental Yield: 7.5% is 8th best]
Start Making Money: Investing for Beginners: How to Invest in Real Estate
Methodology: GOBankingRates.com surveyed 67 of the 100 most populous U.S. cities, based on 2016 Census estimates, and evaluated each city by four main factors. (1) employment growth, sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Economic Summaries in July 2018, with the percentage representing the employment change from May 2017 to May 2018 in each city; (2) population growth, based on changed from 2016 to 2018; (3) increase in home values, based on Zillow index, with the percentage representing the change in median home values for all homes from June 2017 to June 2018, sourced August 2018; (4) rental yield, the percentage value of rental income compared to the property’s market price, based on data from Zillow.
Across the United States, home prices are rising fast, especially because available inventory is low throughout the nation. In some cities, prices are reaching levels not seen since the before the financial crisis.
With wages remaining fairly steady, the rise in home prices is bad news for homebuyers — but good news for investors. To determine which cities are the best and worst for owning investment property — that is, owning property to rent out to tenants — GOBankingRates surveyed 67 of the 100 most populous cities in the U.S.
The study used four main factors to evaluate each city: employment growth, population growth, increase in home values and rental yield. It turns out that the country’s biggest cities aren’t necessarily the best places to own investment property.
The 20 Worst Cities to Own Investment Property
The cities that made the bottom of our list have many factors in common. Whether it’s a falling population, poor employment growth or stagnant home values, these 20 cities are the worst cities to own real estate.
20. Portland, Ore.
Population growth: 2.9%
Employment growth: 2.3%
Increase in home values: 1.1%
Rental yield: 4.7%
Portland suffers from a mixed-bag of good and bad numbers for key factors, which help place it at No. 20 among the worst cities to own investment property. Property is relatively expensive, the average home listing price being $469,000. Based on a median rent of $1,848, it’d take over decades for rental income to pay off buy-in. Coincidentally, Portland is also one of the worst cities for millennial homeowners.
19. Corpus Christi, Texas
Population growth: 0.8%
Employment growth: -0.9%
Increase in home values: 3.4%
Rental yield: 7.6%
Texas is well-represented in this study, with three cities ranking among the best cities to own investment property. Unfortunately, in the case of Corpus Christi, it’s being recognized for being home to one of the worst cities to own investment property.
The biggest drags on Corpus Christi are weak population growth, stagnating home values and employment that declined year-over-year. However, this city could be experiencing an improving local economy — it’s one of the U.S. cities that is getting richer, found a separate study.
18. San Diego
Population growth: 2.2%
Employment growth: 2.2%
Increase in home values: 7.1%
Rental yield: 4.4%
San Diego sneaks into the bottom of our list at No. 18. Although the city experienced healthy population growth, employment grew less than average. The very expensive cost of buying a home makes paying off the cost of owning property difficult. San Diego’s 4.4 percent rental yield is one of the worst in the study, and it would take close to 23 years for rental income to pay off a property.
17. Cincinnati
Population growth: 0.1%
Employment growth: 1.1%
Increase in home values: 7.5%
Rental yield: 6.6%
Like many cities in America’s “old Midwest,” Cincinnati has had to deal with stagnating, if not outright declining, population and employment growth. On the bright side, Cincinnati is one the top U.S. cities where you can own a home for $1,000 a month or less.
16. San Francisco
Population growth: 2.0%
Employment growth: 1.8%
Increase in home values: 9.8%
Rental yield: 4.1%
The biggest drawback for San Francisco is your buy-in, aka the city’s absurd $1.25 million median listing price. Even with a median rent of $4,219, the rental yield is small and it’d take close to 25 years to pay off.
15. Boston
Population growth: 2.1%
Employment growth: 1.6%
Increase in home values: 7.5%
Rental yield: 4.4%
Boston also has a steep buy-in, $725,000 being the median price for all homes. Even with fairly expensive median rent of $2,629, the rental yield is a mere 4.4 percent. At that rate, it’d take you 23 years for rental income to pay off.
However, the city’s housing marketing has proven to be resilient in the past. In fact, it’s one of the 10 cities that survived the last housing crash.
14. Wichita, Kan.
Population growth: 0.4%
Employment growth: 1.0%
Increase in home values: 5.5%
Rental yield: 6.1%
Although Wichita has been named one of the best cities for first-time homebuyers in a previous study, employment growth is sluggish, increasing by only 1 percent year-over-year. The median home value grew just 5.5 percent over the same period, which is quite low.
13. Baton Rouge, La.
Population growth: -0.5%
Employment growth: 0.7%
Increase in home values: 9.9%
Rental yield: 7.1%
Baton Rouge is held back by less-than-average growth in home values and employment. Even worse, the city’s population dropped in absolute terms year-over-year.
12. Virginia Beach, Va.
Population growth: 0.3%
Employment growth: 0.7%
Increase in home values: 1.6%
Rental yield: 6.2%
Virginia Beach ranks among the worst cities to own investment property largely due to poor population numbers and less-than-1-percent employment growth, not to mention a meager 1.6 percent increase in home values.
11. Los Angeles
Population growth: 1.4%
Employment growth: 1.3%
Increase in home values: 8.7%
Rental yield: 4.3%
Los Angeles is a tough city for investment property because of the very steep buy-in. The median home price is approximately $800,000. Even with a median rent of $2,881, the city suffers from one of the lowest rental yields. So buying a home might not be the most accessible way to survive California’s expensive housing market.
10. Louisville, Ky.
Population growth: 0.5%
Employment growth: 1.3%
Increase in home values: 5.5%
Rental yield: 5.6%
Louisville is held back by poor population growth and weak rental yield. Home values increased by a disappointing 5.5 percent year-over-year. Low rents will make it take nearly 18 years to pay off the price of the average property.
9. Pittsburgh
Population growth: -0.16%
Employment growth: 1.0%
Increase in home values: 15.6%
Rental yield: 5.9%
Pittsburgh made the worst list mainly because of its decline in population and weak rental yield. Home values increased significantly year-over-year, but Pittsburgh’s median rent of $1,135 means the payoff is low. Home prices won’t stay low, however, considering Pittsburgh is among the top 20 cities where home prices are rising fastest.
8. Buffalo, N.Y.
Population growth: -1.1%
Employment growth: 1.6%
Increase in home values: 15.2%
Rental yield: 10.9%
Home prices in Buffalo are among the nation’s most affordable. In fact, it’s one of the 30 cities where you can buy a home for under $100,000.
But on the downside for property owners, rent is quite low too, the median being just $898. You could pay off your property in under 10 years, but with several consecutive years of declining population, the future doesn’t look bright for Buffalo.
7. New Orleans
Population growth: 0.9%
Employment growth: 0.8%
Increase in home values: 2.5%
Rental yield: 5%
New Orleans’s principal weaknesses are its paltry less-than-1-percent increase in employment and population over the years. Add to that a year-over-year increase of just 2.5 percent in home values and low rental yield. It’s not coincidental that New Orleans is also one of America’s cities most in danger of a housing crisis.
6. Anchorage, Alaska
Employment growth: -0.1%
Population growth: -0.3%
Increase in home values: 0.5%
Rental yield: 6.7%
Anchorage experienced the third-lowest increase in home values year-over-year. Anchorage has a better-than-average rental yield, and it would take just 13 1/2 years to pay off the property. But the city has seen very little employment growth, which could be related to the city’s outright decline in population.
5. Chicago
Population growth: -0.6%
Employment growth: 0.8%
Increase in home values: 3.0%
Rental yield: 5.9%
The Windy City is one of the worst cities to own investment property for a few reasons: Unimpressive employment growth, a shrinking population and one of the worst year-over-year changes in home values. On top of all that, Chicago is high up on the list of cities most in danger of a housing crisis.
4. Honolulu
Home values increased very little year-over-year. In addition, Honolulu’s expensive home prices compared to rents diminish rental yield significantly. As a result, it would take close to 23 years to pay off the property.
3. New York
Population growth: 0.5%
Employment growth: 1.2%
Increase in home values: 7.8%
Rental yield: 3.2%
Getting into the real estate market in the Big Apple is rather costly. You might want to avoid buying in New York, especially considering it’s one of several U.S. cities where it’s cheaper to rent.
With a median home price of $848,000, it’ll take you quite a while to pay off your property with rental income. Based on a median rent of $2,279, it’d take more than three decades to pay off the price of the home.
2. Milwaukee
Population growth: -1.5%
Employment growth: 0.8%
Increase in home values: 10.7%
Rental yield: 9.3%
Milwaukee suffered an imbalance in key factors. Its 10.7 percent rental yield is actually very solid, but it’s undermined by weak employment and population figures. Milwaukee has one of the worst year-over-year increases in employment, and its population shrank by thousands of people over the last two years.
1. St. Louis
Population growth: -2.2%
Employment growth: 0.9%
Increase in home values: 6.0%
Rental yield: 6.9%
St. Louis suffered from the biggest decline in population from 2016 to 2018. Employment growth year-over-year was also disappointing, less than 1 percent. Although St. Louis might not be ideal for a property owner looking to profit, it is one of the best cities for aspiring millennial homeowners.
The 20 Best Cities to Own Investment Property
There are some common themes when it comes to finding the best city to own investment property. Notably, Florida and Texas both have multiple cities that rank among the best places to own property for rent.
20. Atlanta
Population growth: 4.0%
Employment growth: 1.7%
Increase in home values: 14.1%
Rental yield: 5.1%
Atlanta has become a boomtown in America’s southeast, home to Turner Broadcasting as well as a burgeoning tech scene. In fact, Atlanta has major potential of becoming the next Silicon Valley.
The city’s population has risen 4 percent over the last two years. And home values surged 14.1 percent year-over-year, one of the biggest jumps in the study.
19. Denver
Population growth: 3.8%
Employment growth: 2.8%
Increase in home values: 7.3%
Rental yield: 5.2%
From 2016 to 2018, Denver’s population grew close to 4 percent, while employment grew 2.8 percent from 2017 to 2018. Both rates are better-than-average, as is Denver’s median rent of $2,060, the 11th-highest rent in the study.
18. Kansas City, Mo.
Population growth: 2.7%
Employment growth: 1.5%
Increase in home values: 11.5%
Rental yield: 6.5%
Kansas City makes it onto the top-20 list thanks to above-average population growth and rental yield. The median home price is an affordable $200,000. Though rents could be higher, based on the median rent, you could pay off your property in just over 15 years.
17. Boise, Idaho
Population growth: 2.6%
Employment growth: 3.6%
Increase in home values: 13.3%
Rental yield: 5.2%
Boise boasts the largest growth in employment year-over-year, as well as healthy population growth. Appreciation in home values is encouraging, but rental yields remain on the low side in Boise, contributing to its No. 17 spot overall.
16. Fort Wayne, Ind.
Population growth: 1.3%
Employment growth: 1.8%
Increase in home values: 9%
Rental yield: 7.6%
Fort Wayne made our list of the best cities to invest in real estate for 2016, 2017 and 2018. Lucky for prospective buyers, it’s one of the principal cities where home prices are falling.
With a median home price of $159,900, property is quite affordable in Fort Wayne. Even with a rent of only $1,018 a month, you’d still pay off your property in a little over 13 years, faster than in most cities.
15. Durham, N.C.
Population growth: 4.2%
Employment growth: 1.4%
Increase in home values: 11.7%
Rental yield: 5.6%
Durham is one of two North Carolina cities to make our list of the best cities to buy investment property. The city’s 4.2 percent growth in population is one of the highest rates. Home values rose 11.7 percent year-over-year and are expected to rise another 5.4 percent within the year.
14. Madison, Wisc.
Population growth: 3.1%
Employment growth: 1.1%
Increase in home values: 9.6%
Rental yield: 6.6%
Wisconsin’s capital city fared much better than Milwaukee in our study of the best cities to own investment property. Where Milwaukee’s population fell, Madison’s grew more than 3 percent in the last two years. Plus, affordable home prices yet higher rents make for solid rental yield, and it’ll take only 15 years to pay off your property.
13. Austin, Texas
Population growth: 3.7%
Employment growth: 3.3%
Increase in home values: 7.8%
Rental yield: 5.3%
Austin’s population growth exceeded fellow Texan city San Antonio’s, but Austin ranks slightly lower overall due to weaker home value appreciation and lower rental yield. If you’re a potential homebuyer, Austin is one of 15 cities where homes are getting cheaper.
12. San Antonio
Population growth: 3.3%
Employment growth: 2.2%
Increase in home values: 8%
Rental yield: 6.4%
A booming economy and solid population growth make San Antonio an attractive city in which to own real estate. From 2016 to 2018, its population grew at a rate of 3.3 percent, which is better-than-average, as is its year-over-year employment growth.
11. Las Vegas
Population growth: 3.3%
Employment growth: 2.8%
Increase in home values: 15.9%
Rental yield: 5.3%
Sin City saw healthy growth across the board. The city’s 3.3 percent population growth over two years is the biggest, and its employment growth is better-than-average.
Another huge win for Las Vegas is its home value appreciation year-over-year, which is almost 16 percent. However, you’ll need to act quickly and buy because part of the city is where home prices are increasing in America.
10. St. Petersburg, Fla.
Population growth: 3.3%
Employment growth: 2.3%
Increase in home values: 14.6%
Rental yield: 5.6%
Like Tampa, St. Petersburg employment grew 2.3 percent, and its population growth was very solid as well. But St. Petersburg edged out Tampa with a 14.6 percent rise in home values, one of the best in the study. And if you’re looking to act fast and buy in, St. Petersburg is one of the top U.S. cities where home prices are getting slashed.
9. Tampa, Fla.
Population growth: 4.6%
Employment growth: 2.3%
Increase in home values: 13%
Rental yield: 5.1%
Tampa finished among the best cities to invest in real estate for the third year in a row. The population grew by more than 4.6 percent over the last two years, and its 2.3 percent employment growth is better-than-average.
8. Charlotte, N.C.
Population growth: 3.7%
Employment growth: 2.7%
Increase in home values: 11.9%
Rental yield: 5.5%
Charlotte is another hot spot in the U.S. South, experiencing a solid 3.7 percent population growth over the last two years. Even better, employment in Charlotte grew by 2.7 percent from 2017 to 2018. Though the rental yield is less than average, home values rose nearly 12 percent since last year. With so much going for it, Charlotte also ranks among the 30 hottest cities for new businesses.
7. Phoenix
Population growth: 4%
Employment growth: 3.1%
Increase in home values: 9.6%
Rental yield: 5.5%
Rental property owners in Phoenix will find favorable conditions such as one of the highest rates of population growth and better-than-average employment growth too. The city has been experiencing a major boom in recent years, but success has consequences.
6. Seattle
Population growth: 5.9%
Employment growth: 3.3%
Increase in home values: 11.3%
Rental yield: 4.1%
A leading factor making Seattle one of best cities for real estate investment is its surging population. With an increase of 5.9 percent from 2016 to 2018, Seattle has the highest rate of growth overall. Seattle also boasts one of the greatest year-over-year increases in employment.
5. Columbus, Ohio
Population growth: 2.3%
Employment growth: 1.2%
Increase in home values: 9.2%
Rental yield: 7.9%
Columbus home values experienced better-than-average growth year-over-year. Another key benefit for property owners is comparatively high rent prices versus the cost to buy the property. With a median list price of $179,900 and median rent of $1,184, Columbus has the sixth-highest rental yield and takes less than 13 years to pay off the property.
4. Colorado Springs, Colo.
Population growth: 4.1%
Employment growth: 3%
Increase in home values: 10.3%
Rental yield: 5.6%
Colorado Springs is buoyed by big population growth, an impressive 4.1 percent from 2016 to 2018. This bodes well for an enterprising property owner, not to mention the city’s solid year-over-year increase in employment. However, you’ll have to hurry and buy in because Colorado Springs is one of 20 cities where cost of living is rising fastest.
3. Jacksonville, Fla.
Population growth: 3.1%
Employment growth: 3.2%
Increase in home values: 10.1%
Rental yield: 6.8%
Florida seems to be where to invest in real estate in 2018 and beyond. Jacksonville is one of five cities making it into the top 20.
With a 3.2 percent growth in employment in one year and 3.1 percent increase in population over two years, Jacksonville is conducive to prospective property owners. Its rental yield is better-than-average as well.
2. Orlando, Fla.
Population growth: 4.8%
Employment growth: 3.5%
Increase in home values: 10.7%
Rental yield: 5.7%
For the third year in a row, Orlando is among the top five best cities to own investment property. But for the first time, it’s no longer the No. 1 best place to invest in property.
Orlando’s 4.8 percent increase in population is beaten only by Seattle and Miami’s growth. And, Orlando’s employment growth is second behind only Seattle, making it the runner-up for the best cities to own investment property.
Find Out How to Profit: The Best States for House Flipping
1. Arlington, Texas
Population growth: 2.2%
Employment growth: 3.4%
Increase in home values: 10.3%
Rental yield: 7.5%
Arlington takes the No. 1 spot in our study of where to buy investment property in the U.S. Over the last two years, the city has sustained healthy population growth. Plus, its 3.4 percent year-over-year rise in employment is among the best.
In addition, Arlington’s median home price of $240,000 is on the affordable side, yet rents are comparatively high at $1,498. This makes for a strong rental yield and the ability to pay off your property in a little over 13 years. Altogether, this makes Arlington the best city to own investment property.
Click through to see the best places in every state to get a vacation home.
More on Real Estate
We make money easy. Get weekly email updates, including expert advice to help you Live Richer™.
Methodology: GOBankingRates.com surveyed 67 of the 100 most populous U.S. cities, based on 2016 Census estimates, and evaluated each city by four main factors. (1) employment growth, sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Economic Summaries in July 2018, with the percentage representing the employment change from May 2017 to May 2018 in each city; (2) population growth, based on changed from 2016 to 2018; (3) increase in home values, based on Zillow index, with the percentage representing the change in median home values for all homes from June 2017 to June 2018, sourced August 2018; (4) rental yield, the percentage value of rental income compared to the property’s market price, based on data from Zillow.
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: The Best and Worst Cities to Own Investment Property
