Advertisement
Canada markets close in 1 hour 51 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,923.60
    +129.70 (+0.60%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,474.16
    -3.74 (-0.07%)
     
  • DOW

    39,124.25
    -3.55 (-0.01%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7304
    +0.0005 (+0.06%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    81.57
    +0.67 (+0.83%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    84,464.92
    +843.12 (+1.01%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,287.91
    +21.76 (+1.72%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,336.50
    +23.30 (+1.01%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,030.62
    +12.50 (+0.62%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2830
    -0.0330 (-0.76%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,836.91
    +31.76 (+0.18%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    12.39
    -0.16 (-1.28%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,179.68
    -45.65 (-0.55%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,341.54
    -325.53 (-0.82%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6822
    -0.0009 (-0.13%)
     

With 73% ownership of the shares, Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) is heavily dominated by institutional owners

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Provident Financial Services' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company

  • Insiders have been buying lately

A look at the shareholders of Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 73% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Provident Financial Services, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for Provident Financial Services

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Provident Financial Services?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Provident Financial Services. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Provident Financial Services' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Provident Financial Services. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 15% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 6.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Anthony Labozzetta directly holds 0.7% of the total shares outstanding.

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Provident Financial Services

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Provident Financial Services, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$59m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com