Advertisement
Canada markets open in 2 hours 22 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    22,244.02
    +20.35 (+0.09%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,537.02
    +28.01 (+0.51%)
     
  • DOW

    39,308.00
    -23.90 (-0.06%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7347
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.82
    -0.06 (-0.07%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    75,111.81
    -3,654.47 (-4.64%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,143.86
    -64.83 (-5.36%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,372.70
    +3.30 (+0.14%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,036.62
    +2.75 (+0.14%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3550
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    20,441.00
    +29.50 (+0.14%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    12.41
    +0.15 (+1.22%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,246.47
    +5.21 (+0.06%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    40,912.37
    -1.28 (-0.00%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6787
    -0.0005 (-0.07%)
     

With 61% institutional ownership, Marqeta, Inc. (NASDAQ:MQ) is a favorite amongst the big guns

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Marqeta implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • 50% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders

  • Insiders have bought recently

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Marqeta, Inc. (NASDAQ:MQ), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 61% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Marqeta.

See our latest analysis for Marqeta

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Marqeta?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that Marqeta does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Marqeta, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Marqeta. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Marqeta's case, its Top Key Executive, Jason Gardner, is the largest shareholder, holding 9.2% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.6% by the third-largest shareholder.

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Marqeta

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Marqeta, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$318m stake in this US$3.2b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in Marqeta. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 9.0% stake in Marqeta. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Marqeta , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.