144.79 +0.51 (0.35%)
Pre-Market: 8:00AM EDT
|Bid||144.35 x 1200|
|Ask||144.79 x 1000|
|Day's Range||143.19 - 144.98|
|52 Week Range||120.11 - 148.99|
|Beta (3Y Monthly)||0.73|
|PE Ratio (TTM)||26.73|
|Earnings Date||Jul 16, 2019|
|Forward Dividend & Yield||3.80 (2.63%)|
|1y Target Est||149.17|
Johnson & Johnson’s (JNJ) Pharmaceutical segment is the company’s key revenue driver and accounted for 51.17% of the company’s total revenues in the first quarter. Darzalex, Stelara, Tremfya, and Imbruvica reported double-digit YoY revenue growth in the first quarter.
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) closed the most recent trading day at $144.24, moving +0.82% from the previous trading session.
In its first-quarter earnings press release, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has increased its fiscal 2019 adjusted diluted operational EPS guidance from the previously projected $8.65 to $8.80, which implies YoY growth of 5.7%–7.6%, to $8.73–$8.83, which implies a YoY rise of 6.7%–7.9%. The company also increased the lower end and narrowed its fiscal 2019 adjusted diluted EPS guidance from $8.50–$8.65.
In its first-quarter earnings conference call, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) forecasted a stronger operational revenue growth outlook and expects YoY adjusted operational sales growth of 2.5% to 3.5% and operational sales growth of 0.5% to 1.5% for fiscal 2019. The company has also guided for a YoY reported sales decline of 1.5% to 0.5% for fiscal 2019 based on the euro spot rate of $1.12.
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is up by 10.10%, and Gilead Sciences (GILD) is up by 10.92% on a YTD basis. Both the companies are struggling due to intense competitive pressures either from branded or generic competitors. The consensus recommendation for both Johnson & Johnson and Gilead Sciences is a “buy.”
The index enjoyed another week of strong gains after the Federal Reserve indicated that a rate cut would likely occur next month.
Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) have what it takes? Let's find out.
(Bloomberg) -- An Oklahoma case, the first of more than 1,600 lawsuits filed by U.S. state and local governments against opioid makers to go to trial, could serve as a key benchmark for governments hoping to recoup costs associated with the public health crisis.However, verdicts and legal settlements resulting from the litigation are likely to be smaller than the 1998 global settlement with tobacco companies and won’t significantly affect government budgets, according to Fitch Ratings.The tobacco settlement with 46 states compensated them with more than $200 billion for decades of tobacco-related health-care costs, but wasn’t enough to alter state and local government credit quality, according to Fitch. The opioid epidemic has taken place over a shorter time span, and hasn’t resulted in as many deaths, according to Marcy Block, a Fitch analyst.“It’s severe, but it’s less if you think about the amount of deaths through tobacco usage,” Block said.Ten TimesMore than 47,000 Americans died from opioid overdoses in 2017, including heroin and fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Cigarette smoking is responsible for ten times as many deaths annually, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Oklahoma sued Johnson & Johnson, Purdue Pharma LP and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. in 2017, alleging the companies deceived the public by overstating the benefits of their drugs while downplaying the risk of addiction. Teva in May agreed to pay $85 million to resolve the suit. Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, agreed in March to pay $270 million.Read more about how opioid makers are getting squeezed as cities try to form a negotiating groupThe opioid litigation could cost the pharmaceutical industry between $5 billion and $50 billion, based on the 1998 tobacco deal and costs of the abuse epidemic, according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Holly Froum. Oklahoma is seeking at least $10 billion in damages and penalties for current and future outlays from Johnson & Johnson.“The depth of evidence against the opioid manufacturers, including any potential evidence of fraudulent marketing, will be a key determinant not only of how this case is decided, but the thousands of additional cases against the industry, “ wrote Rachel Barkley, a senior vice president at Loop Capital Markets earlier this month.“Additionally, the size of any settlement would likely serve as a benchmark in future cases,” she said.Securtitized ProceedsStates and local governments issued tens of billions of dollars in muni bonds backed by the tobacco settlement and some used that money to plug budget gaps. The securities are repaid with the money they receive each year from cigarette companies under the settlement. The amount of the payments is based on annual cigarette shipments. There are currently $85 billion of tobacco bonds outstanding, including debt issued to refinance previously issued securities.At least 42 states and more than 1,900 municipalities have sued opioid manufactures and distributors, blaming them for creating a national public-health crisis and demanding billions of dollars in damages.A U.S. federal judge in Cleveland is overseeing opioid litigation brought by U.S. cities and counties and has set two trials for October. The scope of the litigation could result in a global settlement that mimics the resolution to the tobacco cases in the 1990s.The CDC estimates that the total “economic burden” of prescription opioid misuse alone in the U.S. is $78.5 billion a year, including the costs of health care, lost productivity, addiction treatment and criminal justice involvement.Factoring the economic value of lives lost, the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers estimated the costs of the epidemic in 2015 totaled $504 billion.Related: States Are Suing Opioid Makers But Their Pensions Embrace ThemTo contact the reporter on this story: Martin Z. Braun in New York at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editors responsible for this story: James Crombie at email@example.com, Michael B. Marois, Shannon D. HarringtonFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
There has been a flurry of M&A deal announcements this year in the drug industry. Here we discuss three big drug/biotech companies, which may make the next M&A move.
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) closed the most recent trading day at $139.44, moving -0.46% from the previous trading session.
J&J's (JNJ) Tremfya meets the primary endpoint in a late stage study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of the drug for treating patients with psoriatic arthritis.
Key developments of the week include Merck's (MRK) deal to buy Tilos Therapeutics and FDA approval for Roche's (RHHBY) polatuzumab vedotin and Merck's Keytruda.
Teva Pharmaceutical and Purdue Pharma both settled with Oklahoma over allegations they contributed to the state’s opioid crisis.
Huawei Strikes Back…Against Verizon Chinese Telecom Huawei, pretty upset about President Trump’s sanctions against the company that have led to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) banning the company from using its Android operating system for its phones among other things, is striking back by insisting that Verizon (NYSE:VZ) pay it $1 billion in licensing fees for 230 patents […]The post Market Morning: Huawei Strikes Back, 'No' on No No Deal, Ancient Chinese Stoners, Crowded CrowdStrike appeared first on Market Exclusive.
Lockheed CEO Marillyn Hewson made the first insider purchase of J&J stock this year, while Northrop Grumman Chairman Wes Bush bought up Cisco stock.
Tandem Diabetes Care or Insulet: Which Is a Better Pick in June?Evolving insulin delivery landscapeUntil the start of 2017, the insulin pump technology space was mainly dominated by big companies such as Medtronic (MDT) and Johnson & Johnson
The biopharma company started several new clinical trials and enjoyed success in others since the start of the calendar year.
The case, which is premised on a unproven legal theory, could impact the course of future opioid litigation.
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Johnson & Johnson, Chevron, Adobe, Las Vegas Sands and Southern Copper