EVV - Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund

NYSE - NYSE Delayed Price. Currency in USD

Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund

Two International Place
Suite 1400
Boston, MA 02110
United States
617-482-8260
http://funds.eatonvance.com/Limited-Duration-Income-Fund-EVV.php

SectorFinancial Services
IndustryAsset Management
Full Time Employees

Key Executives

NameTitlePayExercisedYear Born
Mr. Thomas E. Faust Jr., CFAChief Exec. Officer and Interested TrusteeN/AN/A1958
Mr. Payson F. Swaffield CFAPresN/AN/AN/A
Mr. Scott H. Page CFAPortfolio Mang.N/AN/A1959
Ms. Catherine C. McDermottPortfolio Mang.N/AN/A1964
Mr. Andrew P. Szczurowski CFAPortfolio Mang.N/AN/A1983
Amounts are as of and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay is salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in USD.

Description

Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund is a closed-ended fixed income mutual fund launched and managed by Eaton Vance Management. The fund invests in the fixed income markets of the United States. It primarily invests in senior, secured floating-rate loans, government agency mortgage-backed securities, and corporate bonds that are rated below investment grade. The fund seeks to maintain an average duration of three and a half years and average quality BBB/BBB- in its investments. It benchmarks the performance of its portfolio against the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index, the Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index, and the Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government Bond Index. Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund was formed on May 30, 2003 and is domiciled in the United States.

Corporate Governance

Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund’s ISS Governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder Rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while a 10 indicates higher governance risk.