Dajin Lithium Corp. (DJI.V)

0.1350 +0.0100 (+8.00%) At close: 3:17PM EST

Dajin Lithium Corp.

789 West Pender Street
Suite 450
Vancouver, BC V6C 1H2
Canada
604-681-6151
http://www.dajin.ca

Sector(s): Basic Materials
Industry: Other Industrial Metals & Mining
Full Time Employees: 

Key Executives

Name	Title	Pay	Exercised	Year Born
Mr. Stanley Brian Findlay	Chairman, CEO & Pres	84k	N/A	N/A
Dr. Catherine Hickson P.Geo, FGAC, FSEG, FRGS, FGC	CFO, COO & Director	119.98k	N/A	N/A
Julie Hajduk	Head of Corp. Devel.	N/A	N/A	N/A
Ms. Rachelle Findlay	Sec.	N/A	N/A	N/A

Amounts are as of December 31, 2018 and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay is salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in CAD.

Description

Dajin Lithium Corp., together with its subsidiaries, primarily engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties in Canada, the United States, and Argentina. It explores for lithium, potash, and boron minerals. The company holds a 100% interest in Teels Marsh Project that covers 403 placer claims covering an area of approximately 3,202 hectares located in the Teels Marsh valley of Mineral County, Nevada; and Alkali Lake project, which include 10 placer claims situated in the Alkali Spring valley of Esmeralda county, Nevada. It also holds 49% interest in the Salinas Grandes Salar project that covers an area of 93,000 hectares located in the Jujuy province, Argentina. The company was formerly known as Dajin Resources Corp. and changed its name to Dajin Lithium Corp. in January 2020. Dajin Lithium Corp. was incorporated in 1987 and is based in Vancouver, Canada.

Corporate Governance

Dajin Lithium Corp.’s ISS Governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder Rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while a 10 indicates higher governance risk.