Advertisement
Canada markets open in 1 hour 41 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,871.96
    +64.59 (+0.30%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,010.60
    +43.37 (+0.87%)
     
  • DOW

    38,239.98
    +253.58 (+0.67%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7298
    -0.0003 (-0.05%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    81.34
    -0.56 (-0.68%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    90,441.62
    +171.10 (+0.19%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,420.60
    +5.84 (+0.41%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,315.50
    -30.90 (-1.32%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,967.47
    +19.82 (+1.02%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6230
    +0.0080 (+0.17%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    17,409.50
    +59.50 (+0.34%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    16.64
    -0.30 (-1.77%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,052.59
    +28.72 (+0.36%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,552.16
    +113.55 (+0.30%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6835
    -0.0015 (-0.22%)
     

Top Actelion shareholder says backs J&J deal above 246 Sfr/share

A general view shows Swiss biotech group Actelion Headquarters in Allschwil near Basel February 17, 2015. REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann (Reuters)

LONDON (Reuters) - A top-30 investor in Swiss pharmaceutical company Actelion said he would back a takeover approach for the whole company from U.S. rival Johnson & Johnson above 246 Swiss francs. Actelion confirmed it was in talks with J&J on Nov. 25, without giving details. Media reports suggested an initial bid of 246 Swiss francs had been rejected, while subsequent reports have suggested a revised bid of around 250 Swiss francs and the potential for rival companies to also table an offer. "If J&J is willing to consider a price higher than the one which has been quoted in the press as an initial offer, it could be a fair price for a straightforward acquisition of the business," the investor said. "However, a more complex deal, involving a partial combination would not be beneficial for the remaining Actelion shareholders." A tie-up with J&J could also represent a "win-win" for Actelion's shareholders and employees, the investor said, as J&J had a good track record of giving its research and development operations "freedom to innovate". (Reporting by Simon Jessop; Editing by Rachel Armstrong)