Advertisement
Canada markets close in 3 hours 38 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,834.76
    -38.96 (-0.18%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,026.87
    -44.76 (-0.88%)
     
  • DOW

    37,968.14
    -492.78 (-1.28%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7304
    +0.0006 (+0.08%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.60
    -0.21 (-0.25%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    87,686.76
    -810.80 (-0.92%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,387.30
    +4.73 (+0.34%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,343.40
    +5.00 (+0.21%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,970.82
    -24.61 (-1.23%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.7060
    +0.0540 (+1.16%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,512.27
    -200.48 (-1.28%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    16.47
    +0.50 (+3.13%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,078.86
    +38.48 (+0.48%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,628.48
    -831.60 (-2.16%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6812
    -0.0007 (-0.10%)
     

Target, Best Buy, and B&H Slash Prices on Apple Watches by $100

I’ve been vaguely aware--and generally skeptical--of rumors that Apple would introduce a second Apple Watch in March, 12 months after its first. A one-year life cycle seemed too short for something purchased--at least by the $10,000-plus crowd--as a Rolex-ish luxury item.

Rumors are cheap, but cash is real, especially when it represents a discount of as much as 29%. So the news Thursday that Target, Best Buy, and B&H--all authorized Apple resellers--slashed $100 off their inventory of Apple Watches sent me to the wayback machine to see where exactly those rumors came from.

They go back two months:

  • Dec. 8, 2015: Mark Gurman, 9to5Mac. “Apple is currently planning a March 2016 event to unveil the second-generation Apple Watch, according to sources with knowledge of the plans. The second version of the Apple Watch would then ship by April, nearly a year after the original model first went on sale.”

  • Jan. 13, 2016: Benjamin Mayo, 9to5Mac. “The Chinese technology media site Commercial Times is claiming that Quanta will begin initial production runs of Apple Watch 2 in January, later in the month. This would match current expectations that the next-generation Apple Watch 2 will be launched about a year after the first Apple Watch, around April… The company has tested an assortment of new features for Apple Watch 2, including the addition of a front-facing camera for FaceTime video calls.”

  • Jan. 15, 2016: Matthew Panzarino, TechCrunch. “Several things that I've heard (from several sources) indicate to me that we won't see a major new hardware model of the Apple Watch in March. Design partnerships, accessories, that kind of thing maybe but not a ‘Watch 2.0’ with a bunch of new hardware features. I could be wrong, of course, but I've heard enough to put it out there.”

  • Jan. 16, 2016: Matthew Panzarino, TechCrunch Update. “I've now heard a bit more that suggests that Apple might ship a minor revision of the Apple Watch that includes a FaceTime camera and not much else--but still that it would not be a full ‘Watch 2.0’ with casing changes and major improvements. Still no word on timing but that could explain the reports of a camera have been showing up.”

  • Feb. 2, 2016: John Paczkowski, BuzzFeed. “Sources in position to know tell BuzzFeed News the company has chosen March 15 as the date it will show off a handful of new products… A selection of new Apple Watch bands is also expected.”

ADVERTISEMENT

.

For more on Apple, watch:

New Watch bands? That would puncture the balloon. A camera, on the other hand, would constitute an improvement major enough for many Watch owners to consider trading up.

Apple will eventually release a new Watch, but I’m still skeptical about the timing. Meanwhile, B&H has also cut prices on Apple’s first-generation 12-inch MacBook. That’s a computer that could use an update.

Subscribe to Data Sheet, Fortune's daily newsletter on the business of technology.

The list of products Apple is rumored to be lining up for a March 15 release now includes the Watch, the Mac, a new iMac Air and a 4-inch iPhone. Should I book a flight to California?

See original article on Fortune.com

More from Fortune.com