Advertisement
Canada markets close in 2 hours 32 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,837.65
    -36.07 (-0.16%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,029.90
    -41.73 (-0.82%)
     
  • DOW

    37,999.99
    -460.93 (-1.20%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7312
    +0.0014 (+0.19%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.66
    -0.15 (-0.18%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    88,187.34
    -665.10 (-0.75%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,397.10
    +14.53 (+1.05%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,342.60
    +4.20 (+0.18%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,973.59
    -21.84 (-1.09%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6980
    +0.0460 (+0.99%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,534.03
    -178.72 (-1.14%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    16.35
    +0.38 (+2.38%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,078.86
    +38.48 (+0.48%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,628.48
    -831.60 (-2.16%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6809
    -0.0010 (-0.15%)
     

The Strange (and Formerly Sexist) Economics of Engagement Rings

Diamonds are forever, but the meaning of the diamond engagement ring has changed dramatically in the last century. Today's symbol of love was once something more like virginity insurance.

DiamondRing2.jpg
DiamondRing2.jpg

Norman Chan/Shutterstock

Why do men buy diamond rings for our fiancées? There's the emotional story. We enjoy making grand gestures of commitment to the people we love. Behind that, there's the marketing story. DeBeers' historic ad campaign, crafted by the real-life mad men at N.W. Ayers, convinced generations of lovers that diamond bands were synonymous with eternal devotion. But behind that, there is economic story that is just as important and fascinating.

ADVERTISEMENT

***

Once upon a time, diamond rings weren't just gifts. They were, frankly, virginity insurance.

A now-obsolete law called the "Breach of Promise to Marry" once allowed women to sue men for breaking off an engagement. Back then, there was a high premium on women being virgins when they married -- or at least when they got engaged. Surveys from the 1940s show that roughly half of engaged couples reported being intimate before the big day. If the groom-to-be walked out after he and the bride-to-be had sex, that left her in a precarious position. From a social angle, she had been permanently "damaged." From an economic angle, she had lost her market value. So Breach of Promise to Marry was born.

But in the 1930s, states began striking down the "Breach of Promise to Marry" law. By 1945, 16 states representing nearly half of the nation's population had made Breach of Promise a historical relic. At the same time, the diamond engagement ring began its transformation from decorative to de rigueur. Legal scholar Margaret Brinig doesn't think that's a coincidence, and she has the math to prove it. Regressing the percent of people living in states without Breach of Promise against a handful of other variables -- including advertising, per capita income and the price of diamonds -- Brinig found that this legal change was actually the most significant factor in the rise of the diamond engagement ring. It's historically plausible. The initial mini-surge in diamond imports came in 1935, four years before DeBeers launched its celebrated advertising campaign. What's going on here?