Advertisement
Canada markets close in 2 hours 35 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,831.66
    +123.22 (+0.57%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,987.94
    -23.18 (-0.46%)
     
  • DOW

    38,019.51
    +244.13 (+0.65%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7278
    +0.0014 (+0.20%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.42
    +0.69 (+0.83%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    88,218.70
    +1,133.05 (+1.30%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,380.26
    +67.64 (+5.15%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,413.00
    +15.00 (+0.63%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,947.10
    +4.14 (+0.21%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6230
    -0.0240 (-0.52%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,386.10
    -215.39 (-1.38%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    18.53
    +0.53 (+2.94%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,895.85
    +18.80 (+0.24%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,068.35
    -1,011.35 (-2.66%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6827
    +0.0006 (+0.09%)
     

Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSE:RPI.UN) Is Due To Pay A Dividend Of CA$0.11

The board of Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSE:RPI.UN) has announced that it will pay a dividend on the 14th of June, with investors receiving CA$0.11 per share. The dividend yield will be 4.3% based on this payment which is still above the industry average.

See our latest analysis for Richards Packaging Income Fund

Richards Packaging Income Fund Doesn't Earn Enough To Cover Its Payments

While it is great to have a strong dividend yield, we should also consider whether the payment is sustainable. Based on the last payment, Richards Packaging Income Fund's profits didn't cover the dividend, but the company was generating enough cash instead. Generally, we think cash is more important than accounting measures of profit, so with the cash flows easily covering the dividend, we don't think there is much reason to worry.

ADVERTISEMENT

If the company can't turn things around, EPS could fall by 33.9% over the next year. If the dividend continues along the path it has been on recently, the payout ratio in 12 months could be 3,095%, which is definitely a bit high to be sustainable going forward.

historic-dividend
historic-dividend

Richards Packaging Income Fund Has A Solid Track Record

The company has been paying a dividend for a long time, and it has been quite stable which gives us confidence in the future dividend potential. The first annual payment during the last 10 years was CA$0.79 in 2012, and the most recent fiscal year payment was CA$1.32. This implies that the company grew its distributions at a yearly rate of about 5.3% over that duration. The growth of the dividend has been pretty reliable, so we think this can offer investors some nice additional income in their portfolio.

Dividend Growth Potential Is Shaky

Investors could be attracted to the stock based on the quality of its payment history. However, things aren't all that rosy. Over the past five years, it looks as though Richards Packaging Income Fund's EPS has declined at around 34% a year. Such rapid declines definitely have the potential to constrain dividend payments if the trend continues into the future.

In Summary

Overall, we don't think this company makes a great dividend stock, even though the dividend wasn't cut this year. The company has been bring in plenty of cash to cover the dividend, but we don't necessarily think that makes it a great dividend stock. We don't think Richards Packaging Income Fund is a great stock to add to your portfolio if income is your focus.

Market movements attest to how highly valued a consistent dividend policy is compared to one which is more unpredictable. Still, investors need to consider a host of other factors, apart from dividend payments, when analysing a company. Taking the debate a bit further, we've identified 4 warning signs for Richards Packaging Income Fund that investors need to be conscious of moving forward. Is Richards Packaging Income Fund not quite the opportunity you were looking for? Why not check out our selection of top dividend stocks.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.