Advertisement
Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    23,568.65
    +93.51 (+0.40%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,626.02
    +30.26 (+0.54%)
     
  • DOW

    41,393.78
    +297.01 (+0.72%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7361
    -0.0003 (-0.04%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    69.24
    +0.27 (+0.39%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    81,346.66
    +39.43 (+0.05%)
     
  • XRP CAD

    0.80
    +0.03 (+3.90%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,606.20
    +25.60 (+0.99%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,182.49
    +53.06 (+2.49%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.6500
    -0.0300 (-0.82%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,683.98
    +114.30 (+0.65%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    16.56
    -0.51 (-2.99%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,273.09
    +32.12 (+0.39%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    36,581.76
    -251.51 (-0.68%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6643
    -0.0004 (-0.06%)
     

Pembina Pipeline Corporation (TSE:PPL) is a favorite amongst institutional investors who own 62%

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Pembina Pipeline implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 42% ownership

  • Insiders have bought recently

If you want to know who really controls Pembina Pipeline Corporation (TSE:PPL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 62% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Pembina Pipeline.

Check out our latest analysis for Pembina Pipeline

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pembina Pipeline?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Pembina Pipeline does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Pembina Pipeline's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pembina Pipeline. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is RBC Dominion Securities Inc., Asset Management Arm with 4.1% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 3.9% and 3.8% of the stock.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Pembina Pipeline

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that Pembina Pipeline Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own CA$19m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Pembina Pipeline you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.