Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    18,380.96
    +255.26 (+1.41%)
     
  • S&P 500

    3,841.94
    +73.47 (+1.95%)
     
  • DOW

    31,496.30
    +572.20 (+1.85%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7916
    +0.0015 (+0.19%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    67.19
    +1.10 (+1.66%)
     
  • BTC-CAD

    65,042.86
    +2,882.08 (+4.64%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    982.93
    +39.75 (+4.21%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    1,704.10
    +5.60 (+0.33%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,192.21
    +45.29 (+2.11%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.5540
    +0.0040 (+0.26%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    12,649.50
    -14.25 (-0.11%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    24.66
    -3.91 (-13.69%)
     
  • FTSE

    6,630.52
    -20.36 (-0.31%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    29,184.88
    +320.56 (+1.11%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6635
    +0.0004 (+0.06%)
     

What we know about the Alex Salmond inquiry

Craig Paton, PA Scotland Political Reporter
·4 min read

The Scottish Parliament has removed and redacted evidence from former first minister Alex Salmond to the inquiry investigating the handling of complaints made against him.

Mr Salmond’s evidence was online for less than 24 hours when the Crown Office raised concerns about its contents and asked for it to be censored by Holyrood officials.

There had previously been a legal wrangle over whether the evidence would be published at all.

– Why was the committee established?

The Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints was set up to look into the Scottish Government investigation of the allegations against the former first minister.

MSPs have so far taken evidence from civil servants, including repeated sessions from Permanent Secretary Leslie Evans, trade unions and SNP chief executive Peter Murrell – who is First Minister Ms Sturgeon’s husband.

– Why did Mr Salmond take legal action?

Peter Murrell taking an oath before the Salmond inquiry
SNP chief executive Peter Murrell has already appeared before the inquiry (Andy Buchanan/PA)

The former first minister did not feel his treatment by the Scottish Government was fair.

It was later found that the lead investigator of the complaints had prior contact with some of the female complainers, with Judge Lord Pentland saying the investigation was “tainted with apparent bias”.

– How has the inquiry gone so far?

The committee has repeatedly voiced frustration with how slow the handing of evidence has been from a number of parties.

The Scottish Government was accused of obstruction last year, with the committee saying it was “completely frustrated” with the lack of evidence.

Both the committee and the Scottish Government were at loggerheads over legal advice provided as part of the judicial review process. MSPs wanted to know when the Scottish Government was advised it would likely lose the challenge raised by Mr Salmond, but ministers said handing over the advice would breach the ministerial code.

On two occasions, MSPs voted for the evidence to be released, with a deal eventually being struck in December to reveal the advice only to MSPs on the committee.

– Didn’t Mr Salmond face trial on sexual misconduct charges?

Yes. The former first minister was cleared of 13 charges at the High Court in Edinburgh in March last year after being arrested in January 2019.

– What were the issues with Mr Salmond’s evidence?

Mr Salmond and the committee have been wrangling in recent weeks over evidence published by the inquiry.

Earlier this month, the former first minister said he would not appear after the committee decided not to publish his submission to a separate investigation into whether Nicola Sturgeon breached the ministerial code over fears it may identify some of the complainers in Mr Salmond’s criminal trial last year.

However, an alteration made to a court order by Judge Lady Dorrian meant the evidence could potentially be made public.

While the committee voted against publication, the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) made the decision to publish anyway.

Nicola Sturgeon and Alex Salmond
Nicola Sturgeon is due to give evidence to the Alex Salmond inquiry (PA)

The evidence, which was released on Monday evening, was online for less than 24 hours before the Crown Office raised concerns with Holyrood about it, asking for redactions to be made.

In his submission, the former first minister accused some in the Scottish Government and SNP of a “malicious and concerted attempt to damage my reputation and remove me from public life in Scotland”.

Ms Sturgeon said her predecessor did not have “a shred of evidence” to support his claims.

On Tuesday morning, the submission was re-released, with a number of paragraphs relating to the set-up of a meeting between Mr Salmond and his successor redacted.

– How does this impact Mr Salmond’s appearance before the committee?

The former first minister was due before the inquiry on Wednesday, but has not yet confirmed whether this will go ahead.

He has already pulled out of an appearance once when evidence he pushed for the committee to publish was not, but it remains unclear if the redactions will be enough for him to refuse again.

– Is the committee inquiry the only investigation into the matter?

No. Ms Sturgeon is currently under investigation by James Hamilton QC to establish if she breached the ministerial code.

Ms Sturgeon referred herself after being accused of misleading Parliament over when she knew of the complaints against Mr Salmond.

She previously said she had been told about the allegations by Mr Salmond himself during a meeting in her home on April 2, 2018.

However, it was later found that Mr Salmond’s former chief of staff Geoff Aberdein had met with the First Minister in her Holyrood office four days prior to that, where she was told of the complaints.

– Will Nicola Sturgeon appear before the committee?

The First Minister is expected to appear before the committee next week and has repeatedly said she looks forward to being able to present her side of the story.