Advertisement
Canada markets close in 6 hours 8 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,672.63
    -201.09 (-0.92%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,998.55
    -73.08 (-1.44%)
     
  • DOW

    37,830.51
    -630.41 (-1.64%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7285
    -0.0013 (-0.18%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.73
    -0.08 (-0.10%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    86,853.74
    -3,920.23 (-4.32%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,365.80
    -16.77 (-1.21%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,331.80
    -6.60 (-0.28%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,969.31
    -26.12 (-1.31%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.7330
    +0.0810 (+1.74%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,410.21
    -302.54 (-1.93%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    17.19
    +1.22 (+7.65%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,049.27
    +8.89 (+0.11%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,628.48
    -831.60 (-2.16%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6809
    -0.0010 (-0.15%)
     

Institutions own 29% of Sylvania Platinum Limited (LON:SLP) shares but individual investors control 59% of the company

Key Insights

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Sylvania Platinum indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy

  • 41% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders

  • Institutional ownership in Sylvania Platinum is 29%

Every investor in Sylvania Platinum Limited (LON:SLP) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 59% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Meanwhile, institutions make up 29% of the company’s shareholders. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Sylvania Platinum.

See our latest analysis for Sylvania Platinum

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sylvania Platinum?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Sylvania Platinum. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sylvania Platinum, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sylvania Platinum. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Africa Asia Capital Limited with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.9% and 4.3% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Johannes Prinsloo directly holds 0.5% of the total shares outstanding.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 21 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Sylvania Platinum

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Sylvania Platinum Limited. It has a market capitalization of just UK£259m, and insiders have UK£4.7m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 59% of Sylvania Platinum shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 10%, of the Sylvania Platinum stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Sylvania Platinum you should be aware of, and 1 of them makes us a bit uncomfortable.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here