Advertisement
Canada markets open in 2 hours 53 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,871.96
    +64.59 (+0.30%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,010.60
    +43.37 (+0.87%)
     
  • DOW

    38,239.98
    +253.58 (+0.67%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7296
    -0.0005 (-0.07%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    81.83
    -0.07 (-0.09%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    90,828.73
    +341.05 (+0.38%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,421.37
    +6.61 (+0.47%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,313.80
    -32.60 (-1.39%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,967.47
    +19.82 (+1.02%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6230
    +0.0080 (+0.17%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    17,398.00
    +48.00 (+0.28%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    16.66
    -0.28 (-1.65%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,063.85
    +39.98 (+0.50%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,552.16
    +113.55 (+0.30%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6842
    -0.0008 (-0.12%)
     

Institutional owners may take dramatic actions as Hudbay Minerals Inc.'s (TSE:HBM) recent 5.1% drop adds to one-year losses

If you want to know who really controls Hudbay Minerals Inc. (TSE:HBM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 5.1% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 17% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called “market makers”, institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in Hudbay Minerals' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hudbay Minerals, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for Hudbay Minerals

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hudbay Minerals?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

ADVERTISEMENT

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hudbay Minerals. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hudbay Minerals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

It would appear that 12% of Hudbay Minerals shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Waterton Global Resource Management, Inc. with 17% of shares outstanding. GMT Capital Corp. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and L1 Capital Pty. Limited holds about 7.0% of the company stock.

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Hudbay Minerals

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hudbay Minerals Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own CA$4.3m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Hudbay Minerals. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 17% stake in Hudbay Minerals. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here