Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    20,758.34
    +17.90 (+0.09%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,136.48
    -43.28 (-1.04%)
     
  • DOW

    33,926.01
    -127.93 (-0.38%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7467
    -0.0043 (-0.58%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    73.23
    -2.65 (-3.49%)
     
  • BTC-CAD

    31,121.69
    -504.13 (-1.59%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    535.42
    -1.43 (-0.27%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    1,877.70
    -53.10 (-2.75%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,985.53
    -15.69 (-0.78%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.5320
    +0.1360 (+4.00%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    12,006.96
    -193.86 (-1.59%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    18.33
    -0.40 (-2.14%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,901.80
    +81.64 (+1.04%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    27,509.46
    +107.41 (+0.39%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6908
    +0.0026 (+0.38%)
     

Institutional investors own a significant stake of 41% in Springfield Properties Plc (LON:SPR)

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Springfield Properties Plc (LON:SPR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 41% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Springfield Properties, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for Springfield Properties

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Springfield Properties?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

Springfield Properties already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Springfield Properties, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Springfield Properties. Our data suggests that Alexander Adam, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 32%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 7.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Innes Smith directly holds 0.8% of the total shares outstanding.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Springfield Properties

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Springfield Properties Plc. Insiders own UK£44m worth of shares in the UK£107m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Springfield Properties. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Equity Ownership

With an ownership of 7.3%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Springfield Properties has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here