Advertisement
Canada markets open in 3 hours 48 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    24,471.17
    +168.87 (+0.69%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,859.85
    +44.82 (+0.77%)
     
  • DOW

    43,065.22
    +201.36 (+0.47%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7242
    -0.0007 (-0.10%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    70.18
    -3.65 (-4.94%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    90,665.16
    +1,395.50 (+1.56%)
     
  • XRP CAD

    0.75
    +0.01 (+1.23%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,669.70
    +4.10 (+0.15%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,248.64
    +14.23 (+0.64%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.0980
    +0.0250 (+0.61%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    20,586.50
    -32.75 (-0.16%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    19.75
    +0.05 (+0.25%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,263.76
    -28.90 (-0.35%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,910.55
    +304.75 (+0.77%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6637
    -0.0005 (-0.08%)
     

Impressive Earnings May Not Tell The Whole Story For Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI)

Thomson Reuters Corporation's (TSE:TRI) robust earnings report didn't manage to move the market for its stock. Our analysis suggests that this might be because shareholders have noticed some concerning underlying factors.

See our latest analysis for Thomson Reuters

earnings-and-revenue-history
earnings-and-revenue-history

An Unusual Tax Situation

Thomson Reuters reported a tax benefit of US$333m, which is well worth noting. This is meaningful because companies usually pay tax rather than receive tax benefits. Of course, prima facie it's great to receive a tax benefit. However, the devil in the detail is that these kind of benefits only impact in the year they are booked, and are often one-off in nature. Assuming the tax benefit is not repeated every year, we could see its profitability drop noticeably, all else being equal.

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

Our Take On Thomson Reuters' Profit Performance

Thomson Reuters reported that it received a tax benefit, rather than paid tax, in its last report. As a result we don't think its profit result, which includes that tax-boost, is a good guide to its sustainable profit levels. Because of this, we think that it may be that Thomson Reuters' statutory profits are better than its underlying earnings power. But at least holders can take some solace from the 16% EPS growth in the last year. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Thomson Reuters.

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Thomson Reuters' profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.