Advertisement
Canada markets open in 9 hours 19 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,873.72
    -138.00 (-0.63%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,071.63
    +1.08 (+0.02%)
     
  • DOW

    38,460.92
    -42.77 (-0.11%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7305
    +0.0007 (+0.09%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.89
    +0.08 (+0.10%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    87,872.80
    -3,366.18 (-3.69%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,390.09
    -34.01 (-2.39%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,325.50
    -12.90 (-0.55%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,995.43
    -7.22 (-0.36%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6520
    +0.0540 (+1.17%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    17,460.25
    -204.25 (-1.16%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    15.97
    +0.28 (+1.78%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,040.38
    -4.43 (-0.06%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,710.66
    -749.42 (-1.95%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6818
    -0.0001 (-0.01%)
     

Do Directors Own Frontier Lithium Inc. (CVE:FL) Shares?

If you want to know who really controls Frontier Lithium Inc. (CVE:FL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. Warren Buffett said that he likes 'a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people'. So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

Frontier Lithium is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of CA$43m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions don't own many shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about FL.

View our latest analysis for Frontier Lithium

TSXV:FL Ownership Summary, September 5th 2019
TSXV:FL Ownership Summary, September 5th 2019

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Frontier Lithium?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

ADVERTISEMENT

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Frontier Lithium, for yourself, below.

TSXV:FL Income Statement, September 5th 2019
TSXV:FL Income Statement, September 5th 2019

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Frontier Lithium. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

Insider Ownership Of Frontier Lithium

The definition of company insiders can be subjective, and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board; and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board, themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Frontier Lithium Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just CA$43m, and insiders have CA$11m worth of shares in their own names. I would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, mostly retail investors, hold a substantial 73% stake in FL, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives retail investors collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow .

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.