Canada markets closed
  • S&P/TSX

    19,472.74
    +181.76 (+0.94%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,232.60
    +30.98 (+0.74%)
     
  • DOW

    34,777.76
    +229.23 (+0.66%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.8239
    +0.0012 (+0.15%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    64.82
    +0.11 (+0.17%)
     
  • BTC-CAD

    71,423.47
    +2,547.80 (+3.70%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,480.07
    +44.28 (+3.08%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    1,832.00
    +16.30 (+0.90%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,271.63
    +30.21 (+1.35%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.5770
    +0.0160 (+1.02%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    13,752.24
    +119.39 (+0.88%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    16.69
    -1.70 (-9.24%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,129.71
    +53.54 (+0.76%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    29,357.82
    +26.45 (+0.09%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6770
    -0.0047 (-0.69%)
     

David Cameron's Repeated Lobbying Of Treasury And Bank Of England Revealed

Graeme Demianyk
·News Editor, HuffPost UK
·6 min read

David Cameron personally lobbied the top civil servant at the Treasury on behalf of the failed finance firm Greensill Capital – but the full extent of their interactions remains a mystery as documents published were heavily redacted.

Sir Tom Scholar, the permanent secretary at the Treasury, revealed that the former prime minister had called him on his mobile phone as well as sending a series of texts.

Following his evidence to the Commons public accounts committee, the Treasury released correspondence between Greensill and officials.

Some of the 30 pages of emails and documents were heavily blacked out, and details of two text exchanges show Sir Tom referring to Cameron as “my old boss” before large swathes of redaction begin.

“Had some incoming from my old boss – see below,” it reads.

After a chunk of black, it adds: “Well done for holding off (REDACTED). Not often anyone manages that.”

Details of a second text exchange were fully redacted.

(Photo: HM Treasury)
(Photo: HM Treasury)
(Photo: HM Treasury)
(Photo: HM Treasury)

The release reveals Sir Tom telling Charles Roxburgh, the second permanent secretary at the Treasury, the former prime minister wanted to know if the Chancellor had a “particular view” of the Greensill application for money through the government’s Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF).

A further release of information confirmed Treasury economic secretary John Glen had a text message exchange with Cameron about the rejected Greensill proposal in June offering to “discuss with you privately this afternoon if that would be useful”.

Earlier, the Bank of England disclosed that Cameron had set up a call between the firm’s founder, Australian financier Lex Greensill, and deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe.

It released a series of emails showing how he tried to enlist Sir Jon’s help when the Treasury rejected Greensill’s application to join the support scheme.

Greensill, which Cameron had been working for since 2018, filed for insolvency after failing to secure funding. Its demise rendered Cameron’s reported share options worthless.

The collapse of Greensill has threatened thousands of UK jobs at Liberty Steel which was dependent on it for its financing.

The latest disclosures come after Boris Johnson earlier this month commissioned the senior lawyer Nigel Boardman to investigate after it emerged Cameron had lobbied chancellor Rishi Sunak and other ministers on the firm’s behalf.

Giving evidence, Sir Tom said he had been contacted by Cameron in early April last year over a proposal Greensill had made to join the CCFF.

He said Cameron had his official mobile number because he used to work for him when he was still in office.

“If a former minister that I have worked with asks to talk to me, I will always do that,” he said.

“The call I took from Mr Cameron was not a substantive discussion of the proposal. It was simply a call to draw it to my attention. I said ‘Thank you very much, this is something we are looking at’.”

Sir Tom said that the proposal had been rejected by Treasury officials as it did not meet the criteria for the scheme.

However documents released by the Bank under the Freedom of Information Act show that Mr Cameron was reluctant to take no for an answer.

On April 3 2020, he emailed Sir Jon complaining that despite “numerous conversations” with the Treasury, Greensill had “failed to get anywhere”.

He said the firm had dealt with every objection that had been raised, but the Treasury appeared “hung up” on the fact that the CCFF was for “non-financial corporates”.

“This is surely irrelevant,” Cameron said.

“At a time when we are – rightly – worried about how quickly banks can get loans out to small businesses, why are we potentially cutting off a market that already pumps cheap credit directly into SMEs.”

He then emailed Sir Jon again on April 22 complaining that they had still not received the “green light” from the Treasury.

“I don’t want to put you to the trouble of a long email chain when ultimately this is an HMT call (and we continue to talk to them at every level) but could I ask you to do a one to one with Lex Greensill so that he can brief you on where we have got to,” he wrote.

A Bank note of call between Sir Jon and Greensill said that the deputy governor made clear that the firm fell “outside the boundaries of the scheme”.

In his evidence to the committee, Sir Tom said that Greensill had been dealt with in a “completely appropriate” way by the Treasury.

“We were approached quite persistently from this company. We listened to what they said. We analysed it, we tested it and in the end, despite them submitting a series of successive proposals, we decided to reject them all,” he said.

Roxburgh said the firm’s proposal to join the CCFF had been rejected for a number of reasons.

“They were proposing that special purpose vehicles could have access to the scheme and that was not consistent with the scheme’s design,” he said.

“They were suggesting that the CCFF should buy commercial paper that had non-standard terms and again that was not consistent with the design.”

Further proposals it put forward to improve the delivery of finance to small businesses active in the supply chains of large companies were, he said, also turned down.

The officials were pressed by Tory MP Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown as to why they spent so much time dealing with proposals which he described as “dodgy” and sounding “like a Ponzi scheme”.

Sir Tom said that at the time – at the start of the pandemic – the Treasury had been under “immense pressure” to do more to support business.

“Everybody said we were too slow, not doing enough, should be more ambitious, so we were investigating a whole series of ways in which we could support the flow of credit to businesses,” he said.

This content is not available due to your privacy preferences.
Update your settings here to see it.
This content is not available due to your privacy preferences.
Update your settings here to see it.

Following the release of the correspondence between Treasury officials, Labour called for the chancellor to “explain his role in the return of Conservative sleaze”.

Shadow chancellor Anneliese Dodds said: “We need to follow the money. Greensill was carrying the begging bowl from the Bank of England to the Treasury and back.

“It was desperate for access to taxpayer money, and the government granted that access by accrediting it to the CLBILS scheme in June.

“Hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayer cash were put at risk by that decision.

“We need to understand why the chancellor and the Treasury did nothing when they were aware Greensill was deep in the red three months earlier.

“The chancellor can’t keep ducking this. He must come out of hiding and explain his role in the return of Conservative sleaze.”

Related...

Ministers Were Warned Of A Scandal Around Informal Advisers Like Lex Greensill

Is Tory Cronyism Labour’s Best Weapon To Defeat Boris Johnson's Pork Barrel Politics?

David Cameron’s Greensill Lobbying Was ‘Acceptable’, Minister Claims

This article originally appeared on HuffPost UK and has been updated.