Advertisement
Canada markets close in 25 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    24,150.82
    +182.32 (+0.76%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,743.38
    +43.44 (+0.76%)
     
  • DOW

    42,302.19
    +290.60 (+0.69%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7368
    -0.0011 (-0.14%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    74.50
    +0.79 (+1.07%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    84,677.54
    +2,046.00 (+2.48%)
     
  • XRP CAD

    0.73
    +0.01 (+2.00%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,667.80
    -11.40 (-0.43%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,208.25
    +28.11 (+1.29%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.9810
    +0.1310 (+3.40%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    18,113.52
    +195.05 (+1.09%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    18.89
    -1.60 (-7.81%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,280.63
    -1.89 (-0.02%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,635.62
    +83.56 (+0.22%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6709
    +0.0024 (+0.36%)
     

CGI Inc. (TSE:GIB.A) is a favorite amongst institutional investors who own 62%

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, CGI's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • The top 19 shareholders own 51% of the company

  • Insiders have been selling lately

Every investor in CGI Inc. (TSE:GIB.A) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 62% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CGI.

Check out our latest analysis for CGI

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CGI?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

CGI already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at CGI's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in CGI. Distinction Capital is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 4.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of CGI

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of CGI Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own CA$187m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in CGI. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Equity Ownership

With a stake of 11%, private equity firms could influence the CGI board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CGI better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for CGI that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.