Advertisement
Canada markets open in 32 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,873.72
    -138.00 (-0.63%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,071.63
    +1.08 (+0.02%)
     
  • DOW

    38,460.92
    -42.77 (-0.11%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7295
    -0.0002 (-0.03%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.81
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    86,921.61
    -4,134.78 (-4.54%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,357.33
    -25.25 (-1.82%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,341.80
    +3.40 (+0.15%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,995.43
    -7.22 (-0.36%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6890
    +0.0370 (+0.80%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    17,390.00
    -274.50 (-1.55%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    16.71
    +0.74 (+4.64%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,075.79
    +35.41 (+0.44%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,628.48
    -831.60 (-2.16%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6821
    +0.0002 (+0.03%)
     

California power company charged with manslaughter over 2020 wildfire

 (AFP via Getty Images)
(AFP via Getty Images)

A California power company has been charged with manslaughter for its equipment sparking a 2020 wildfire that left four people dead and hundreds more homeless.

Pacific Gas and Electric, the country’s largest utility company, have been charged on 31 counts by prosecutors over the Zogg Fire, which burned last year near the city of Redding.

Shasta County District Attorney Stephanie Bridgett announced that the charges against the company including 11 felonies.

Last year the company pleaded guilty last year to 84 counts of involuntary manslaughter in the 2018 blaze caused by its electrical grid that destroyed the town of Paradise in the deadliest US wildfire in a century.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Zogg fire broke out on began on 27 September 2020 and burned around 87 square miles of the Sierra Nevada, killing four people and destroying almost 200 homes.

State investigators announced earlier this year that the fire started when a pine tree fell onto a PG&E transmission line.

The company has already been sued by Shasta and Tehama counties for negligence amid allegations that the company had failed to remove the tree despite it being marked for that action two years earlier.