Advertisement
Canada markets open in 4 hours 11 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    24,102.71
    -60.12 (-0.25%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,695.94
    -55.13 (-0.96%)
     
  • DOW

    41,954.24
    -398.51 (-0.94%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7333
    -0.0009 (-0.12%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    75.40
    -1.74 (-2.26%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    84,986.40
    -1,444.50 (-1.67%)
     
  • XRP CAD

    0.72
    -0.01 (-1.93%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,655.20
    -10.80 (-0.41%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    2,193.09
    -19.71 (-0.89%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.0260
    +0.0450 (+1.13%)
     
  • NASDAQ futures

    20,045.50
    +52.75 (+0.26%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    22.35
    -0.29 (-1.28%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,200.46
    -103.16 (-1.24%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,937.54
    -395.20 (-1.00%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6666
    -0.0022 (-0.33%)
     

With 71% ownership of the shares, The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE:SCHW) is heavily dominated by institutional owners

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Charles Schwab implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company

  • Recent purchases by insiders

If you want to know who really controls The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE:SCHW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 71% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Charles Schwab.

See our latest analysis for Charles Schwab

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Charles Schwab?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Charles Schwab. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Charles Schwab's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Charles Schwab. Our data shows that The Toronto-Dominion Bank is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.7% and 5.5% of the stock.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Charles Schwab

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in The Charles Schwab Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$1.6b. we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Charles Schwab. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.3%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Public Company Ownership

It appears to us that public companies own 10% of Charles Schwab. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.