Advertisement
Canada markets close in 1 hour 18 minutes
  • S&P/TSX

    21,754.51
    +46.07 (+0.21%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,960.78
    -50.34 (-1.00%)
     
  • DOW

    37,883.05
    +107.67 (+0.29%)
     
  • CAD/USD

    0.7270
    +0.0006 (+0.09%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.04
    +0.31 (+0.37%)
     
  • Bitcoin CAD

    88,430.83
    +1,963.27 (+2.27%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,383.01
    +70.39 (+5.36%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,410.00
    +12.00 (+0.50%)
     
  • RUSSELL 2000

    1,940.36
    -2.60 (-0.13%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6170
    -0.0300 (-0.65%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,266.96
    -334.53 (-2.14%)
     
  • VOLATILITY

    18.67
    +0.67 (+3.72%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,895.85
    +18.80 (+0.24%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,068.35
    -1,011.35 (-2.66%)
     
  • CAD/EUR

    0.6825
    +0.0004 (+0.06%)
     

5 reasons the FCC might be wrong about net neutrality

This week the FCC passed new rules on net neutrality, which were essentially designed to limit the ability of internet service providers (ISP) to either slow down or boost the speeds of websites. While many experts praised the ruling, not everyone was thrilled by the outcome.

Who else should be regulated on the Net? Who is too big to fail, w little competition and has too much power over our wallets and experience

— Mark Cuban (@mcuban) February 27, 2015

On this week’s Structure Show podcast, Mark Cuban — the billionaire businessman who made his name in tech and now owns the Dallas Mavericks and is featured on the television show Shark Tank — came on to opine on net neutrality and why he thinks the new rules are bad for the internet and bad for competition. What follows are a couple takeaways on why Cuban believes net neutrality will do more harm than good.

Download This Episode

ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe in iTunes

The Structure Show RSS Feed

1. The internet is working fine the way it is

“Look, I’ve had my same position on net neutrality for more than ten years and that is I think what is happening on the net works. I mean, I was involved in the internet right when it started. We started Audionet, which turned into Broadcast.com back in 1995 and for the past 20 years things have worked. And now the net neutrality folks seem to be getting some momentum creating the perception that the big ISPs that got us to this point have now become bad citizens and they are going to ruin the internet unless they’re regulated. And from my perspective, I like the way technology goes and I like the competition and I like the way things are going. I think introducing regulations via the FCC is a huge mistake and I said so.”

2. Government bureaucracy is worse than ISP dominance

“Comcast has always had that power, right? It’s not like AT&T and Comcast had just recently become super big companies and they’ve changed their actions. I mean, one of the tenets of net neutrality is that no website, no legal website, should ever be discriminated against. Name me one that has been.”

3. Don’t worry about broadband providers. Worry about Google and Apple

“If you’re going to talk about concerns, what’s the fastest growing access methodology for the internet? It’s mobile, right? And who controls access to mobile? Google and Apple. So the far greater risk, and I still don’t think it requires legislation, but the far greater risk is OK…if Apple decides that Comcast’s app is not right, Comcast is not going to be able to reach most of their market to get access through an app to their own broadband, which is crazy when you think about it but it’s a possibility.”

4. Net neutrality laws could end up like patent laws

“For all the years that we’ve been in the tech industry since we’ve been about 8 or 9 years old, the majority of tech companies did not get involved in DC. They did not get involved in regulation. This is all a recent phenomenon. And now, everybody’s got a lobbyist, everybody’s involved, everybody’s got their opinion and I think it backfired on us, just like patent laws backfired on us. Look what happened with patents. That’s what happens when…legislation gets involved with technology. And so I just think that if you’re looking for pain points that the broadband ISPs aren’t it.”

5. Remember Janet Jackson’s infamous wardrobe malfunction? That’s the FCC for you

“What if there’s some decision that just shocks everybody … It’s happened time and time again where FCC regulations get tested, the decision goes against the FCC and they fight it for years. Just like the wardrobe malfunction from the Super Bowl in 2004, they spent money for 8 years. The FCC that you want to be the department of the internet is the company that spent taxpayer money trying to cover, debating, arguing the penalty of showing Janet Jackson’s nipple … Now those people who want to protect decency in the United States and the content that’s delivered over the internet is the purview of the FCC, where else would you go?”

Related research and analysis from Gigaom Research:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.



More From paidContent.org