Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 1:13PM ET - Canadian Markets close in 2 hours and 47 minutes.

The IPO Class of 2010

by Steve Schaefer, Forbes.com
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
provided by

The market for public stock offerings froze up during the equity market dislocation following the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, and even though conditions have thawed over recent months the real rebound is on hold until 2010 when a number of high-quality companies could hit the market in a period reminiscent of another post-recession comeback. Even despite recent turmoil, the IPO market never truly recovered from its peak at the end of the dot-com bubble. There's a ways to go.

After a long dormant period, companies that would already be public in better times will be coming to market further along the development curve, but at valuations that are far more palatable to investors. Matt Regan, a managing director at W.R. Hambrecht, finds historical similarities to the IPO bumper crop of 1986, when tech heavyweights Microsoft (nasdaq: MSFT), Oracle (nasdaq: ORCL), Sun Microsystems (nasdaq: JAVA) and Adobe Systems (nasdaq: ADBE) all went public coming out of the lean years that followed the 1982-83 recession, posted strong returns for shareholders over the ensuing years and became industry heavyweights.

Go to Forbes.com to view the slideshow

(Opens new window)

Technology companies are going to lead this recovery too, Regan says, since they are not coming off a bubble like financial or housing-related stocks. With the merger option off the table for many companies due to the long lockup in credit markets that has only recently loosened, the IPO route is the logical exit for most companies backed by venture capital or private equity firms, Regan added.

Don't expect the IPO market to retreat to its bubble-happy ways of the late-90s though. Regulatory hurdles like Sarbanes-Oxley have made the IPO process far more rigorous than it was in the days of the tech bubble, and some management teams have no interest in taking their businesses to the public market. Phil Clough, a managing general partner at ABS Capital Partners who sits on the board of Rosetta Stone (nyse: RST), said some executives who have been through the process and then started new companies are not interested in the increased regulatory scrutiny and shareholder criticism that comes with the territory as a public company.

Not all management is soured on IPOs though. Bob Farrell is the chief executive of business software firm Metastorm, which pulled its S-1 registration filing in November 2008, when capital markets were in disarray and every day brought the threat of another shock to the system. Farrell told Forbes back in June that he still saw an IPO as a good way for Metastorm to raise funds for acquisitions that will boost its growth, but felt that institutional investors still weren't quite ready to jump back into software offerings due to the lack of appetite for any risk.

Conditions have changed though, and Farrell sees important signs of stability that are necessary to get the IPO market back on track. "If we had an S-1 out now there's no way I'd pull it," Farrell said, but for now Metastorm is content to execute its strategy and wait for more consistency before it resumes its effort to go public.

"I've met with bankers who are portraying the pickup in activity as a growing trend and pushing for deals," Farrell said, noting that the deals that have priced this year have performed well. But for the companies that have been able to come to market this year, it hasn't been all smooth sailing. Most have seen growth in their share price post-IPO, but there have also been hiccups. Rosetta Stone rose steadily after pricing its offering in April, but lowered its full-year guidance and pulled back a planned US$137 million secondary offering Aug. 17, just a few weeks after issuing strong second-quarter numbers at the end of July.

Regan says that type of misstep is magnified in a still fragile environment like the current one. To wit, Rosetta Stone's shares, which opened for trading at US$23.00 in April, then rose to nearly US$33.00, were cut by a third when it revised its outlook and have struggled to come back since.

Paul Bard, vice president of Greenwich, Conn.-based independent research shop Renaissance Capital that specializes in IPOs, says a healthy IPO market has a pace of about 15-20 offerings a month, a level it took six months to reach in 2009. Like other industry observers though, Renaissance sees signs of a pick-up, estimating another 20-30 deals will price by the end of 2009 between companies that have already registered their offerings and others that are making final preparations.
Aside from those already in, or ready to enter, the pipeline, Renaissance offered a handful of potential companies that may be poised to lead the IPO class of 2010. The names range from high-profile companies like Facebook and LinkedIn to venture-backed start-ups like ZipCar and Tesla Motors. Bard also points to private equity- or government-backed companies that may be looking to return to the public markets next year, including Toys R Us, General Motors and hospital operator HCA.

Jackie Kelley, the Americas IPO leader at Ernst & Young, found similar signs of renewed activity. Positive trends from the second quarter — fewer pulled filings, more deals pricing and moving out of the pipeline — have continued through the beginning of the third quarter. Kelley also points out that much of the action is going on behind the scenes and doesn't show up in present data. "Ernst & Young is working with so many companies right now that are either prepping IPOs or looking into getting the process started," she said.

Even if the IPO market has turned the corner and ready to bounce back — Regan cautions that "all bets are off if the market re-tests its March lows" — it will take much longer to determine if the crop of newly-public companies that come out of this recession will be able to hold a candle to the heavyweights that endured another tough period before launching their public lives in 1986.

Still, the opportunity for venture capitalists and other private owners to take companies public is an important driver for innovation in the broader economy.

Go to Forbes.com to view the slideshow

In Pictures: Potential 2009 IPOs

 

Rates

Rates provided by Fiscal Agents

  • Mortgages Type Rate
    1-yr Closed 3.54%
    3-yr Closed 4.15%
    5-yr Closed 4.97%
  • GICs Type Rate
    1-yr Annual 0.95%
    3-yr Annual 2.12%
    5-yr Annual 2.77%
  • RRSP Type Rate
    1-yr 0.94%
    3-yr 2.09%
    5-yr 2.75%

Today On Yahoo!

Top Stories

Obama vows to 'finish the job' in Afghanistan
AFP - WASHINGTON (AFP) - President Barack Obama vowed to "finish the job" in Afghanistan as ...

Entertainment

Ted Kennedy's widow, Vicki, tells Oprah she won't run for husband's Senate seat
The Canadian Press - CHICAGO - The widow of Sen. Edward Kennedy tells Oprah Winfrey that she ...

Sports

Soccer-CSKA Moscow 0 VfL Wolfsburg 0 - latest
Reuters - Nov 25 (Reuters) - CSKA Moscow 0 VfL Wolfsburg 0 - Champions League Group B latest:

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • The Canadian Press
  • Forbes
  • Canadian Business Online
  • CNN Money
  • 50 Plus
  • Investor Education Fund

Sponsored Links

Discount Rosetta Stone
Find Great Deals on Rosetta Stone. Compare & Review Rosetta Stone.
BottomDollar.com/Rosetta-Stone
Free Report from The Fool
Separates the winners from the wannabes. Download and try it.
www.fool.com
Improve IPO Pricing 25%
Assure Best Bids, Lowest Fees.
MGHoldingsSIP.com

Quotes and other information may be supplied by independent providers. All information is provided on an “AS IS” basis, for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes, advice or planning. It would be unreasonable for you to make any trade without first consulting an authorized financial advisor and verifying the accuracy of all information. Yahoo! and its independent providers do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of any information provided herein, and expressly disclaim any and all liability for any decisions made in reliance thereon. The information is not an endorsement or recommendation by Yahoo! of any trade, even where the information relates to Yahoo!. Notwithstanding anything herein, Yahoo! does not hold itself out as an advisor or planner of financial services of any kind. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found herein, and to be otherwise bound by the Yahoo! Terms of Service.