Mon, 21 May, 2012, 3:39 AM EDT - Canadian Markets closed for Victoria Day

Bank of Canada raises concerns over home equity loans, housing correction

By Julian Beltrame, The Canadian Press

OTTAWA - Canadians are becoming increasingly vulnerable to a housing correction, exposing them to a perfect storm of high debt and falling assets, the Bank of Canada warns.

In a book of four research papers released Thursday, the central bank suggests many Canadians have constructed their finances on a house of cards, with ever rising home values the key and vulnerable support.

The bank economists point out that home prices have risen sharply in the past dozen or so years along with debt, as households needed both bigger mortgages to buy homes and used equity from higher home values to finance other purchases.

"These facts are interrelated, since rising house prices can facilitate the accumulation of debt," the report notes. "Households therefore experience a significant shock if house prices were to reverse."

It adds that falling home prices could have a "relatively large impact on consumption" as equity disappears and the ability of householders to borrow is diminished.

It calculates that a 10 per cent drop in home prices could generate a one per cent decline in consumption, which would slow economic growth.

TD Bank chief economist Craig Alexander said the fact the central bank devoted it's winter review on a single topic — debt — demonstrates how seriously it takes the issue.

And he says the bank's example of a 10 per cent correction is not unrealistic given that it is the over-valuation figure the International Monetary Fund gives for Canadian housing stock. Alexander himself believes it could be as much as 15 per cent.

He agrees that the central bank has every reason to be worried, because a correction could knock the stuffing out of Canada's fragile recovery.

"When it comes to the housing market and personal debt, I'm not worried that a housing market correction will lead to a problem in the Canadian financial system," he said.

"I worry more about the economy. I worry that if you have a drop in home prices and you wind up with consumers struggling to deleverage, it will lead to an economic contraction."

The bank does not suggest a U.S.-style housing collapse for Canada is in the offing, nor does Alexander. A big part of the problem south of the border was due to easy credit conditions, something Canadian banks have avoided.

But the bank's economists are clearly concerned nevertheless about the pitfalls from the steady increase in household debt, which has risen as a percentage of income from 110 per cent in 1999 to 153 per cent currently.

And debt to household equity has risen as well even as home prices have soared.

Part of that is well grounded on growing incomes, it says, but part is also due to super-low interest rates and unrealistic expectations that home values will keep rising.

Of particular concern to the central bank is that much of the increase in household debt was not mortgages, but loans secured by home equity which Canadians in turn spent on consumer items and renovating their homes.

"These findings suggest that household indebtedness constitutes an important source of risk to household spending, since it makes households more vulnerable to substantial negative economic consequences in the event of a correction in house prices," one paper states.

The Bank of Canada papers were released hours after a new analysis by the TransUnion management firm found that non-mortgage borrowing had slowed sharply in the past year to a one per cent increase, the lowest since 2004.

While that represents only a small fraction of what Canadians owe, analysts have noted that overall debt accumulation has also been slowing of late and that expectations for home prices have moderated.

That's a good indicator that Canadians are starting to heed the message, said Alexander.

One paper issued by the central bank suggested that home prices have been influenced not only by low mortgage rates but also on expectations that values will keep rising. History shows that's a bad bet, the paper states.

"Over history, these other factors are associated with the medium-run tendency of house prices to rise faster than their long-run trend for a number of years and then subsequently adjust back to trend."

Those corrections could be as great as 20 to 30 per cent relative to the growth in the economy, it said.

The Bank of Canada also notes that increasing debt levels have made Canadians more vulnerable to bankruptcies and insolvencies. Since 2000, about 100,000 Canadians a year have filed for insolvency or bankruptcy, triple the number in the 1980s.

But the bank points out that in most cases, these were not homeowners. The vast majority are renters and the unemployed who have taken on too much in the way of credit card debt and bank loans.

Market Data

  • Currencies
    Currencies
    NamePriceChange% Chg
    0.98100.00+0.15%
    CADUSD=X
    0.76790.00+0.05%
    CADEUR=X
    0.62060.00+0.21%
    CADGBP=X
  • Commodities
    Commodities
    NamePriceChange% Chg
    97.410004-1.41-1.43%
    CLZ11.NYM
    3.50-0.09-2.51%
    NGX11.NYM
    1,652.00-70.70-4.10%
    GCV11.CMX
    35.3150.22+0.63%
    SIV11.CMX
  • Popular Stocks
    Popular Stocks
    NamePriceChange% Chg
    530.380.00+0.00%
    AAPL
    10.990.00+0.00%
    RIMM
    600.400.00+0.00%
    GOOG
    10.010.00+0.00%
    F
    18.950.00+0.00%
    GE
    22.570.00+0.00%
    PFE
    2.850.00+0.00%
    NOK
 
  • cjf  •  Kitchener, Ontario  •  2 months ago
    And adding HST to new home sales isn't helping either Dalton.
    • wulfgarwarlord 2 months ago
      both HST and GST are illegal taxes,ottawa has no right to tax us directly.
    • truecanuck 2 months ago
      HST, the Harper Sales Tax
    • bruce w 2 months ago
      Mulroney put the gst on house sales. There was no provincial tax on houses till they made the h.s t.Mulroney Harpo same scam artists they are still friends.
  • junior  •  2 months ago
    Best comment I read so far is that the banks are "in it for the money - and only for the money". Let's face it people, banks are not providing service simply out of the goodness of their hearts - wake up - of course they are in it for the money. The last time I checked, most of us go to work all day, and guess what - not for free!! I will certainly agree that the banks could do a much better job in ensuring that consumers are well informed and understand the financial products they are about to sign up for - but come on, how many times have we all heard people maxing out their LC's only to take 5 star vacations or buying new cars? Even renovating your home - to go into debt only to buy the latest stainless steel appliances and granite counter tops, and then try to justify it all by telling yourself you are investing in your home. This is BS, and this is precise line of thinking that it getting people into serious trouble. Debt levels of 153% of income - and this is the average. Blows me away. I am 38 years old and will mortgage free in 2 years or so. 2 kids, saving for their education and on top of that putting something away for my retirement so that I hopefully won't have to live off OAS. I find it funny to hear people commenting that they don't want to save so that they don't jeopardize their OAS benefit. It is a ridiculous strategy, if you really think about - I am going to blow all my money away today, buy that 80" TV and screw saving for my retirement because I don't want to loose out on the few hundred buck a month you get from OAS. Holy crap - that line of thinking is scary.
    • Seedaview 2 months ago
      Junior, you need to rush out and invest in bank shares.
    • junior 2 months ago
      agree, and already did, and have done quite well on my positions.
      Hey if they are making all the money, then why not have a piece of it. Good advise Seed.
    • tidbit 2 months ago
      Your wife must have a good job.
  • Ben  •  Chatham-Kent, Ontario  •  2 months ago
    Banks are making billions in profits and paying us, nothing in interest. Their using our money and giving us nothing in return, it's time people woke up and said enough of this BS, use our money, pay us some decent interest. Greedy bunch of Bastxxxds.
    • Bert 2 months ago
      It's your money, if you don't like what the bank is doing with it, take it out and go somewhere else. Spend a little time to invest your money and keep all the profits to yourself.
    • Sue 2 months ago
      Banks are great for everyday banking, but the worst place to hold your investments. Investments held at the bank, are not protected from creditors, and on death, are subject to probate fees. Banks also try to lock in your investments, so you cannot access your funds without paying large penalties.
      As the saying goes, you could be wealthy.
      You just won't have any money.
    • Mari 2 months ago
      If you take some money out from your RRSP's little by little if your income is low and your age is close to 71 and put it in a bank account, you won't be taxed as high and that money will be there to use when necessary or just to save whatever. Your spouse can receive all your RRSP's and such but your children will have to pay tax but not through inheritance on a regular bank account. My mother did that and saved us a lot of money to the govt. (my dad died many years ago)
  • choppy61  •  Edmonton, Alberta  •  2 months ago
    Duh!!!!!

    I couldnt agree with you more Adele and Dale. Banks are buying up businesses but not profit sharing with the people that supplied them with the money in the first place! WTF? And their doing this so they can distance themselves from all their clients when the crunch comes and the housing market drops leaving people bankrupt while they still swim in the profits! TOTALLY GREEDY HEARTLESS ASSHOLES!
    • 3¢worth 2 months ago
      Banks are profit sharing by paying dividends to their investors, and no not all investors are "rich".
    • tidbit 2 months ago
      The bonus eats the profit.
    • Sigh 2 months ago
      Instead of bashing, and blaming. as 3¢worth says, banks share profits. Buy some stock in the banks and they will pay you a dividend higher than what you get in their "savings account". The federal government give you a tax break on those dividends, whereas interest earned in a savings account is taxed at the same rate as your income. Use the banks lines of credit to buy those stocks and and you can write off the interest. If you sell and make a loss, you get to carry that loss forward indefinitely to offset future gains or carry them back 3 years of offset previous capital gains. If you make a capital gain, the feds cut you a tax break on that as well. So instead bitching, do something about it, if you are intelligent enought to rant and follow the herd, be more intelligent and take advantage of breaks given to individuals by the government and take advantage of the credit the banks give so generously, though they may not be as generous as what "big business" gets, use it to your advantage, spend your energy getting ahead with the breaks that many do not use. Its not hard, there is lots of free information out there and it does not take a lot of money to get started, don't bitch if you don't try. Run your financal life like a business and you will be further ahead.

      Why are the rich in the minority? Because they take the time to understand the rules of the game and use it to their advantage to get ahead instead of sitting around bitching about it.
  • B R  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  2 months ago
    Nothing new. A broken record that so many people just love to keep dancing to.
    • Lauren 2 months ago
      I so agree B R. Its like in medieval times when the peasants paid money to the church and monarchy people just seem to believe that those in charge are right because they tell us they are. We don't question it because we don't know what the alternative is. I keep hoping people will all get angry enough to change the system so it works the same for everyone. If we each had only our individual vote equality might actually be possible. Yet I know people are reluctant to change so we continue down the same shitty, familiar path.
    • Girardo 2 months ago
      Vote Harper out.
    • A Yahoo! User 2 months ago
      How is this Harper's fault and no I am a Liberal voter.All I want is an honest answer so I can understand the process by which Harper caused this.
  • wright  •  2 months ago
    TO "BC" YUP IM IN MY 50'S AND IVE DONE INTERIOR DEMOLITION FOR 30 YRS. IN BANK OFFICES, GOVT OFFICES , AND IVE SEEN THE WASTE VERY FEW CITIZENS WOULD BELIEVE, CARPET 2 MONTHS OLD AND RIPPED OUT, A 300 FT LONG WALL MOVED 6 INCHES, FURNITURE MOVED IN THE ADDICTION RESUCH CENTRE BECAUSE SOME MORON DIDNT LIKE THE 2 WEEK OLD SHADE OF BEIGE. I WORKED ON THE 56TH FLOOR OF COMMERCE COURT THEY HAVE A FULLY OPERATIONAL KITCHEN PRIVATE CHEF, DINING ROOMS, THEY HAD A PLAQUE ITH THE PRESIDENT AND 200 VICE PRESIDENTS AND THAT WAS 20 YRS AGO MUST BE 1000 NOW. THEY RAPE US FOR OUR MONEY PUT US IN DEBT THEN ADMONISH US FOR OUR SPENDING . BANKERS , POLITICIANS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES HAVE SURPASSED LAWYERS FOR BEING THE #$%$ OF THE EARTH. AS FAR AS TYPING IN CAPITOLS MY EYES ARE BAD FROM 30 YRS OF SUCKING DUST IN DEMO JOBS . ANYONE THAT DOESNT LIKE IT DONT READ IT.
  • offy...  •  2 months ago
    If I didn't have to pay $ 10.000.000 to the banks CEO'S I wouldn't have any debt.....cut down those salaries and put some $$$$$ into the cosumers hand by raising wages ...or cutting costs on every day living....making 60.000 a year just doesn't cut it anymore in this country. CANADA
  • Deep  •  2 months ago
    Canadian banks suck the poor!
    They charge for cheques. Banks in Many countries don't!
    There is monthly fee, if balance is below xxx dollars. Most banks in Asia/ Africa don't charge the fees.
    The CEO of banks in Canada get Millions of $$$ as yearly salary. Insanity!
    Most Asian banks don't pay very high to top person, there is some balance between hardwork person as bottom and top executive.
    Many hidden fees is mentioned in 'fine print'. This should be disclosed in 'alert' section, in bold letters.
  • A Yahoo! User  •  2 months ago
    Do you really want the government involved in determining what the value of your house will be and how much money you can borrow against it? Those who have invested in a house with the intention of selling it in the future or "cashing in" years after it is paid for as a way of funding their retirement will be the ones who are screwed. Why punish everybody for the sake of protecting a few who can not manage their own money? The discipline of failure is the best teacher, and must not be removed or subsidized out of life.
  • sultanofsuds  •  London, Ontario  •  2 months ago
    So basically don't get a line of credit that goes against your mortgage.....(home equity line of credit) ?
  • Nicholas  •  Vancouver, British Columbia  •  2 months ago
    Being rich and being wealthy are two different things. The wealthiest people in the country live below their means, manage their finances with a fine tooth comb, don't make common finance mistakes, and yet live quite comfortably. Borrowing against your house to buy consumer goods? NO WONDER! And its NOT the banks fault. Its no ones fault but the people doing this, for whatever reason they feel they NEED these things, to impress people, to feel adequate, its there decisions that they have to hold themselves accountable for. The wealthy, don't borrow unless they have the means to pay off balances. It is possible in this country to get ahead, but along with it comes the word sacrifice, back in the day, they didn't have new better versions of the same phone coming out every 9 months, or newer better flatscreens, or 18 different kinds of organic sprouted grain bread. They did the best they could with what they had, interest rates were higher back then, which made them think twice about borrowing, and they still came out ok. The banks just offer the option to borrow, they don't make anyone do it, no matter how much they wrap it up in a shiny red bow, its ultimately the customer decides whether to take or not.
  • dea  •  2 months ago
    In my opinion this report is somewhat flawed in leaving out the fact that house prices rose way beyond what they are worth in a fraction of the time that wages, or basic essentials rose. It seems to me that anything that can make the banks or government money is what rises in cost at alarming rates. We, the consumer are then expected to accept these facts and not question them. Realtors have their hand in the bucket as well by keeping house prices too high they make better profits for a job that in reality is not a lot of work. The downside of real estate is that so many people get into it during a boom that the competition is enormous to make sales when there is the bust after the boom. In my opinion.
  • dea  •  2 months ago
    The average wage earner that does not live beyond their means, still has difficulty getting ahead when everything else goes up in price except for their wages. Add in medical issues, job loss, a death in the family or any unforeseen emergency and the lack of a safety net due to it already being absorbed by the continual increases in the cost of living and now the worth of their home dropping beyond their purchase price because it was over priced to begin with... ! There is far too much greed, and ignorance, driving this economy and not enough honesty! Advertising by governments stating that everything is booming in certain provinces brings unsuspecting home buyers into a sure to be bust sooner or later unless they are lucky enough to have landed an enormously stable and well paying job... which if there really were enough of those there would be less employees working in the all so many jobs of the fast food industry etc.
  • Adele  •  2 months ago
    Well WTF are we supposed to do to survive?? We are taxed to no end and everything costs way too much, we are gauged pretty much in all aspects of our lives! What a bunch of B U L L S H I T!! Why not help us out and stop adding and raising taxes and try lowering costs so we average Canadians can live normal lives! What A Bunch Of A S S H O L E S!!!!!!!
  • Citizen 827  •  Regina, Saskatchewan  •  2 months ago
    Save now buy later. Live better.
  • Kathy  •  Burlington, Ontario  •  2 months ago
    its the new form of business. Ignore the law as it relates to the publicly traded company. The publicly traded comopany is legislated under the law as a person and its mandate is to make as much money for the shareholder as possible.

    With CEO"s and Boards of management, taking the lions share and far beyond any greedy in the history of thieving and greed, paying the masses a pitance and forcing the shareholder to absorbe the losses the best position for these individuals is to make the rest of us run around like crazy people trying to make ends meet.

    Its a rigged game that CEO's have figured out and they have at thier disposal the legal tallent to protect themselves.

    Financial institutions and other publicly traded companies, have those who own it not, making internal policy which is not law and stripping the wealth of the many who work just as the CEO does and just as the Board of management does.

    Our laws regarding financing were so strong we did not have the issue in the states. They have tried to create this in Canada and the politicians are on board because when the masses are struggling you can do what ever you want and lets face it the leader is party boy harper and so the rug will be pulled out deliberately.

    smoke and mirrors.... the party boys have arrived and they feel entitled to tens on millions of dollars in wages even if the shareholder is not makeing any... what is wrong with this picture...

    We are headed for Political thievery and corporate thievery like we have never seen before. AIG tip of the iceburg..
  • piccaso1881  •  2 months ago
    Has house horniness finally blown it's wad in Canada? lol
  • Crazy Hair  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  2 months ago
    Why should the government bail people out that are too stupid to be able to keep track of there own finances. If you can't afford it don't buy it! There are always 2nd hand options out there... Besides if the government does bail these uncontrolled money spenders out, I can bet that the tax payers that can handle there own finances well be paying the price! TIME TO GO BACK TO WHAT WORKED BEFORE... CASH! NOT CREDIT!!!
  • bc  •  2 months ago
    The economists are way off base when they say " part of that is well grounded on growing incomes". Lets not base an example on minimum wages for sake of comparison. Otherwise Canada would be in extreme poverty.

    If houses were 60000 per year in 1985 (average Canadian home price) - the same house with barely any improvements in 2012 is worth 420000. REAL figures on my own middle class Canadian street. That is 700% increase. 7 times the original cost. Mind you newer detached homes average over 500,000 to 700,000. Real figures.

    Wages in 1985 for well paid clerical workers or union workers in non- industry, 1985 were maybe 25000 per year per person. 25,000 times 7 equals 175,000 per year if one wants to see commensurate growth in wage according to the economist ideals.

    Wages for industry base, journey men, those with degrees could command 60000 - their current wage would be 7 times that amount, which is 420,000 dollars PER YEAR.

    A .1% increase (1/100th of a percent) is the reality for many Canadians over the course of the past 20 years taking into considering job cutbacks, wage roll backs to make companies manage their bottom lines etc. I claim average female is probably making 30,000 to 40,000 per year. Average male 50,000 to 100,000 per year (with degrees or trade certificates).

    Starter houses (mobile homes) are over 100 thousand a year. Condos 300,000, and regular starter detached house in the 350 to 400 thousand dollar range. A decent newly built detached home is in 500 thousand dollar range.

    So I challenge these so called professional ECONOMISTS to explain where the INCOME growth substantiates the hyper inflated economic and housing cost increases.

    In essence REAL balanced growth would mean mortgages as in the past should be 25 year locked in rates and NEVER be over 3%. None of this 5 year and less term crap!
    Balanced growth should have average hard working Canadian making at least 18.00 per hour.
    Balanced growth would have homes ranging 3 times or at most 4 times the income of average Canadian.
    Ergo, wages should be at least 30,000 to 50000 a year for most. Those with education, trades make higher makes sense.
    House prices should be 3 times that amount. So that the average 3 bedroom bungalow on a 10,000 sq. foot lot should cost less than 200,000 - 250,000 for a 1000 sq foot home. 300 thousand to 500 thousand homes would be those with dual incomes or professional degrees and so forth. The above scenarios based on dual income families might show different figures.

    Our cost of living and income growth does NOT match the reality of prices for heat, food and housing today. Economists are blaming the average hard working Canadian who maintains the backbone of this country and it is the government and policy makers who have SCREWED royally with the Canadians trust and welfare. In particular, going GLOBAL is HURTING Canadians - Royally!
  • cjf  •  Kitchener, Ontario  •  2 months ago
    The only province that should be nervous is Ontario. McGuinty has the debt so high we are heading towards a collapse. It is high time that SOB stops giving everyone in the public sector raises and focusses on his wateful spending and lowering living costs for all of us or we are screwed.