Mon, 21 May, 2012, 3:28 AM EDT - Canadian Markets closed for Victoria Day

B.C. finance minister considers business tax hike to balance budget

By Dirk Meissner, The Canadian Press

VICTORIA - The B.C. Liberal government delivered a tight provincial budget Tuesday, doling out some modest goodies and signalling the start of a year-long campaign to convince voters it can deliver fiscal responsibility.

The budget promises to balance the books by the end of next year, a promise that would allow the party to campaign in the May 2013 provincial election with its economic record somewhat burnished after the disastrous repercussions of implementing and then backing out of the harmonized sales tax.

To get there, Finance Minister Kevin Falcon has promised to reduce the growth of health-care spending to 3.2 per cent by the end of 2015. That compares with an almost five per cent increase between 2010 and 2012 and a seven per cent increase in the three years prior to that.

Universities and colleges are being asked to find $70 million in administrative savings by the end of 2015, and the government is on the prowl to make just over $700 million by selling off buildings and land it is no longer using.

And Falcon broadly hinted his government will turn away from its groundbreaking carbon tax, an environmental legacy of former premier Gordon Campbell that was approved by B.C. voters during the 2009 election when the Opposition New Democrats ran against it.

And he said a proposed tax cut for small businesses would not be implemented, and larger businesses may have to pay higher corporate taxes if the economy doesn't improve.

The budget forecasts a deficit of $968 million this year and a surplus of $154 million in 2013-2014.

The deficit for the budget that wraps up the current 2011-2012 fiscal year on March 31 is forecast to hit $2.5 billion, better than the $3.1 billion deficit Falcon projected last fall.

"Keeping British Columbia's fiscal house in order does mean some tough decisions in the short-term," Falcon said during his speech to members of the B.C. legislature. "But consider what's at stake here. It's our future — the future of this province, and the future of our people."

He said the New Democrats are not taking heed of the economic turmoil around the world and plan to introduce tax-and-spend programs that will only increase the provincial debt.

"That's the wrong direction," said Falcon. "The lesson is clear: the tax, spend and borrow approach is not just wrong. It is potentially catastrophic."

But Falcon's budget includes tax increases, along with tax breaks aimed at the elderly and families.

He said medical services premiums will rise by four per cent — about $5 a month for a family of three — after three straight years of six-per-cent increases.

Falcon said the government's commitment to balance the budget has reached the point where he is prepared to raise business taxes, actions once considered unheard of for the free-enterprise coalition.

NDP finance critic Bruce Ralston said it appears Falcon's pledge to balance the budget is more about the Liberals trying to save their political fortunes rather than helping British Columbians.

"Only a month ago he was really doubting the ability of the government to balance the budget on that timetable, yet now, for, I think, largely political reasons, he's decided that he's going to assert that he can," said Ralston. "Whether he can or not is really doubtful."

The 2.5 per cent small business tax, promised to be eliminated as part of the failed attempt to win the HST referendum, will stay and only be reviewed when the books improve, Falcon said.

Falcon said he is prepared to raise the general corporate income tax rate to 11 per cent from 10 per cent in April 2014 if the budget situation doesn't show signs of improvement.

"It underscores how serious we are about meeting our target and our requirement to balance the budget in 2013-2014," he said in a pre-budget briefing with reporters. "We've said we don't want to have to do it, but we've put it in (the budget). We felt it was important to signal to everyone they have to do their bit."

B.C. Business Council executive director Jock Finlayson said raising corporate taxes is not what businesses want to see from the Liberals, but he's prepared to stomach a temporary increase.

"It is not something my community is going to welcome," he said. "But in the grand scheme of things, it's a modest step."

The carbon tax was implemented in 2008 as part of a goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by one third by 2020

"We're proud in British Columbia that we were leaders," Falcon said.

But he added: "We had always anticipated that others would follow us down this path. That didn't happen. Because of that, we think now is the time to say no further increases (in the tax), and lets have an opportunity to have input from British Columbians."

Environmentalists said putting the carbon tax on hold is a step backwards for the province.

"We're missing an opportunity and a vision," said David Suzuki Foundation spokesman Ian Bruce.

Falcon introduced a series of family-oriented tax breaks aimed at new home buyers seniors and families with children.

First-time, new, home buyers will be eligible for a bonus of up to $10,000. Seniors will be eligible for a home renovation tax credit of up to $1,000, and families will be eligible to tax credits for arts and sports programs for kids.

Iglika Ivanova, a B.C. Centre for Policy Alternatives spokeswoman, said the budget and tax credits do nothing to help the record numbers of B.C. families and seniors living in poverty.

And the Hospital Employees Union and the B.C. Health Coalition decried the budget's apparent neglect to address last week's ombudsman's report into seniors.

"The ombudsperson's report clearly reveals that strengthening home and community care services will greatly improve the lives of seniors," said Alice Edge, co-chair of the coalition.

"The province has said it intends to act on the report, yet there is little evidence in this budget to suggest it intends to take serious action for better seniors' care."

John Cummins, leader of the B.C. Conservatives, a party which has been surging in the polls and threatens to split the Liberal vote in the next election, said the budget has delivered "ballooning debt levels, higher taxes and growing spending."

Cummins decried the decision to cancel the small business tax reduction, saying it will kill jobs.

But the provinces chartered accountants applauded the government's commitment to return to a balanced budget, including the changes to business taxes.

"Given the current global economy and fiscal challenges facing government, we are not surprised to see these tax measures," said Richard Rees, chief executive officer of the Chartered Accountants of B.C.

Market Data

  • Currencies
    Currencies
    NamePriceChange% Chg
    0.98140.00+0.19%
    CADUSD=X
    0.76780.00+0.03%
    CADEUR=X
    0.62080.00+0.26%
    CADGBP=X
  • Commodities
    Commodities
    NamePriceChange% Chg
    97.410004-1.41-1.43%
    CLZ11.NYM
    3.50-0.09-2.51%
    NGX11.NYM
    1,652.00-70.70-4.10%
    GCV11.CMX
    35.3150.22+0.63%
    SIV11.CMX
  • Popular Stocks
    Popular Stocks
    NamePriceChange% Chg
    530.380.00+0.00%
    AAPL
    10.990.00+0.00%
    RIMM
    600.400.00+0.00%
    GOOG
    10.010.00+0.00%
    F
    18.950.00+0.00%
    GE
    22.570.00+0.00%
    PFE
    2.850.00+0.00%
    NOK
 

6 comments

  • Smack_Attack  •  2 months ago
    Heres a thought grab back the cash we pay for all the buy outs to low level bureacrats and don't pay huge pensions to already rich politicains after only a few years of service and make them PAY TAXES
  • Bill  •  Yuma, United States  •  2 months ago
    The liberal gov. in BC is not a friendly Gov. for seniors or anyone on fixed income. I,ve been told the taxes we will be paaying after July 1st 2012 will be 51 cents of every dollar we get. Polititions are ruening one of the most beautiful provinces in canada. It started with Gordon Campbells lies.
  • Stuart  •  2 months ago
    The Industrial Age Is Over, A New Age Has Begun, Regulate Greed.
    Regulate greed , is a bank or financial institution able to justify profits comparison to world poverty. There has to be a way to put into statistics a legible table that shows the wealth of any financial tool used versus poverty in a country . Yes profits should be made but not a perpetual right to infinity. At what point is enough enough? and i say that i also mean in lifestyle, inheritance , to whom that wealth flows, to whom it keeps in power , in privilege . Any size vessel
    when filled at some point will overflow, are not families, corporations, banks , bankers those same vessels ? When is that container full ? The ability to spend $1 million a day for the rest of your life without going broke ? maybe $500 K ? maybe more , maybe less ? maybe that amount a week or a month or a year even. Think about it seriously folks , at what point do these organisations need more funds in the war chest is this not another form of hoarding ? collecting needless amounts for a time that never comes.
    A change in the thinking process of these entities would be a welcome change. The gathering or concentration must have a meaning, or a purpose, and what could that possibly mean? What would one be amassing of such fortunes for?One of two things is my guess and that is either to do good or God forbid evil, yes i said it . When your family is taken care of and friends, what’s left? Time is a thing that marches on a pretty equal rate for rich and poor alike. The richer you are doesn’t guarantee any more time on earth. Broken down to its simple elements has a simple message to all hear , “ keep enough to weather the future,but not five futures “ .
    The “NFL “ yes that football league that everybody loves has revenue sharing amongst the entire league so that smaller cities have the same competitive chance that the big city teams do. Is the NFL socialist ? yes to a certain degree it is but not to the point where it cannot flourish & grow . I submit that the working class & poor are being deprived of the same “revenue sharing “ spirit , “trickle down” economics is a fallacy. Things need to run not trickle so that all that participate have a chance to compete & be successful.
  • wjmdurham  •  2 months ago
    Gov'ts answer for EVERYTHING is raise taxes. They would NEVER think "CUT SPENDING" or even "SPEND MORE EFFICIENTLY". Legislate public service salaries to a maximum of the median salary of the private sector equivalent jobs and wage freezes until the private sector catches up to that. If the public "servants" don't like it they can always quit and join the private sector. Legislate that the public service is restricted to 20% of the private and freeze hiring until that is reached. Legislate that 90% of funding for every service must be spent on the front line ( the people that actually provide the service and their equipment ) and a maximum of 10% total costs for the bureaucracy ( their wages, benefits, office costs, etc.). There are MANY ways that gov'ts can reduce their spending with zero effect on the actual provision of services to the taxpayer.
    • Economics is a form of br ... 2 months ago
      Yeah, you want to tear honest working people down rather than build others up, eh Billy? What a wonderful human being you are.
    • wjmdurham 2 months ago
      No Comrade, I want people to be paid what they are WORTH - NOT what the union has extorted over the years to over double what they are worth.
    • Economics is a form of br ... 2 months ago
      Really, so exactly who decides what people are worth? The 1 percenters? I know that's what you want - an economy ruled by the elite, and to hell with what working people want.
  • Economics is a form of br ...  •  2 months ago
    Ah, what a bunch of bull, Billy. You clearly didn't really read the article above before you launched into you favorite rant about taxes.
  • A Yahoo! User  •  Kelowna, British Columbia  •  2 months ago
    increasing business taxes is a sure way to increase unemployment. we need to drastically reduce government spending and waste. the carbon tax was the worst idea government has come up with since the 1999 influx of hong kongers and their head tax. we already have a reputation of very high taxes and big spending.